logo       

Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Default Route Support on Router: msg#00369

Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPv6: Default Route Support on Router
Hello!

> Oh I see... perhaps you imply I should destroy CONFIG_RT6_POLICY
> remnants as well? :-)

Yes, the bits in route.c must be killed.

But I would prefer to preserve subtrees support in ip6_fib.c.
It is... well, it really constrains hacking, but in a useful manner,
not allowing to forget that a radix node may open second level lookup.

Alexey





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>