In article <200209280444.IAA02959@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (at Sat, 28 Sep 2002 08:44:29
+0400 (MSD)), kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx says:
> I am not sure that it is really interesting though. Just now I cannot
> imagine what user can invent which is not covered by system-wide rules,
> bind() and IP{V6}_PKTINFO. Well, if you think more hairy scheme is
> interesting,
> feel free to implement this.
we need per application (per socket) interface
for privacy extension (public address vs temporary address) and
mobile ip (home address vs care-of address).
--
yoshfuji
|
