I missed the original post. Is there a patch availble for testing?
Jim
On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 01:27:41AM +1000, James Morris wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Sep 2002, David S. Miller wrote:
>
> > If you have things that must happen in a sequence to flow through
> > your path properly, that's where the "stackable" bit comes in. You
> > do that one bit, skb->dst = dst_pop(skb->dst), then your caller
> > will pass the packet on to skb->dst->{output,input}().
> >
> > Is it clearer now the kind of things you'll be able to do?
> >
>
> So, this could be used for generic network layer encapsulation, and be
> used for GRE tunnels, SIT etc. without the kinds of kludges currently in
> use? Sounds nice.
>
>
> - James
> --
> James Morris
> <jmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
--
James R. Leu
|
