"David S. Miller" wrote:
>
> From: george anzinger <george@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 07:16:24 -0700
>
> [ BTW please start using newlines in your emails, instead of 1,000
> character monstrosities lacking them. Thanks ]
Sure. I am trying to find something that works with patches
as well as text. Still looking I guess.
>
> On the other hand, I prefer to think of the linux community as a
> group of folks working on making one of the best OSs on the planet
> even better.
>
> Right, and I don't think CONFIG_PREEMPT makes the planet better.
> In fact, now that you mention it, I think CONFIG_PREEMPT is a pile
> of crap.
Can we agree to disagree :)
>
> > It requires a full audit of the networking in the new preemption
> > environment.
>
> Any pointers on what to look for would be welcome.
>
> And you go right back to asking me to do the work for you.
> What is wrong with you?
I said they would be welcome, not that you have to reply...
--
George Anzinger george@xxxxxxxxxx
High-res-timers:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
Real time sched: http://sourceforge.net/projects/rtsched/
Preemption patch:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml
|
