"David S. Miller" wrote:
>
> No mention of what kernel version, what patches applied, etc.
> so we cannot help you.
Sorry bout that. It is a 2.4.17 kernel and the test is to
verify that we have the preempt code right. The question at
hand is if this is a likely preempt problem or just a pure
overload. The stress on the network is rather high.
I would expect that the network code would recover from this
sort of thing, so we are looking for a preempt issue at the
moment. Still, it could just be the way things work in the
2.4.17 kernel so I thought I would ask.
--
George Anzinger george@xxxxxxxxxx
High-res-timers:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/
Real time sched: http://sourceforge.net/projects/rtsched/
Preemption patch:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml
|
