Re: ANK's PSCHED_TDIFF_SAFE change unmasked old bu: msg#00032

Re: ANK's PSCHED_TDIFF_SAFE change unmasked old bug (~0UL != 0xFFFFFFFF): msg#00032

Subject:	Re: ANK's PSCHED_TDIFF_SAFE change unmasked old bug (~0UL != 0xFFFFFFFF)

--snip/snip
> Probably the test should be changed. I'm not sure how. How to detect
> that long is 64 bit in cpp ?

by using BITS_PER_LONG (which is defined in include/asm/types.h)

        tm

-- 
in some way i do, and in some way i don't.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:	ANK's PSCHED_TDIFF_SAFE change unmasked old bug (~0UL != 0xFFFFFFFF), Martin Devera
Next by Date:	Re: ANK's PSCHED_TDIFF_SAFE change unmasked old bug (~0UL != 0xFFFFFFFF), kuznet
Previous by Thread:	ANK's PSCHED_TDIFF_SAFE change unmasked old bug (~0UL != 0xFFFFFFFF), Martin Devera
Next by Thread:	Re: ANK's PSCHED_TDIFF_SAFE change unmasked old bug (~0UL != 0xFFFFFFFF), Martin Devera
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

News | FAQ | advertise