Hello Alexey,
from this:
- long __delta = (tv1) - (tv2); \
- if ( __delta > (bound)) { __delta = (bound); guard; } \
+ long long __delta = (tv1) - (tv2); \
+ if ( __delta > (long long)(bound)) { __delta = (bound); guard;
} \
<kuznet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (02/03/19 1.181.2.12)
Make pkt_sched.h:PSCHED_TDIFF_SAFE behave sane when measuring
I think you are responsible for the change. I hope it wasn't me who
suggested this change ;) Old code was ok in
sense that in CBQ you used unsigned bound. Then the diff was safe
even if tv1<tv2 which can be true when time wraps (which is true
at least with PSCHED_TIME_SOURCE == JIFFIES) because comparison
is unsigned and result will never be negative.
Now the unsigned bound is converted into signed long long and _delta
can be negative AND unbounded ... I just started to seen it when
one HTB user switched to 2.4.19-pre7.
I'd suggest this change:
- long long __delta = (tv1) - (tv2); \
- if ( __delta > (long long)(bound)) { __delta = (bound); guard;
+ long __delta = (tv1) - (tv2); \
+ if ( __delta > (u32)(bound)) { __delta = (bound); guard; } \
Here the return value will be always positive and < bound.
any objections ?
devik
|
