logo       

Re: MIT Roofnet article at TechnologyReview.com: msg#00006

network.wireless.cu-wireless

Subject: Re: MIT Roofnet article at TechnologyReview.com

On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, David Young wrote:

> The work-conserving thing to do is to continue with the CUW software,
> adding ETX to our OSPF routing, or producing an HSLS daemon with ETX.

do you have an estimate on about how long this would take to do? also,
i'm starting the process of applying for the OSI grant -- i'm going to
need a bunch of breakdowns on a) what software improvements need to be
built (and time estimates for each feature); b) what software improvements
would be nice to have (and time estimates for each feature); c) any other
major time sinks that creating the next generation of our software would
require.

--sascha

_______________________________________________
Cu-wireless mailing list
Cu-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/cu-wireless
Project Page: http://cuwireless.ucimc.org




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise