|
Re: MIT Roofnet article at TechnologyReview.com: msg#00006network.wireless.cu-wireless
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, David Young wrote: > The work-conserving thing to do is to continue with the CUW software, > adding ETX to our OSPF routing, or producing an HSLS daemon with ETX. do you have an estimate on about how long this would take to do? also, i'm starting the process of applying for the OSI grant -- i'm going to need a bunch of breakdowns on a) what software improvements need to be built (and time estimates for each feature); b) what software improvements would be nice to have (and time estimates for each feature); c) any other major time sinks that creating the next generation of our software would require. --sascha _______________________________________________ Cu-wireless mailing list Cu-wireless@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.cu.groogroo.com/cgi-bin/listinfo/cu-wireless Project Page: http://cuwireless.ucimc.org |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: MIT Roofnet article at TechnologyReview.com: 00006, David Young |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | UIUC wireless information:: 00006, Sascha Meinrath |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: MIT Roofnet article at TechnologyReview.comi: 00006, David Young |
| Next by Thread: | UIUC wireless information:: 00006, Sascha Meinrath |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |