|
RE: TS via VPN slow? - NX Protocol?: msg#00108network.thinstation.devel
NXclient is in thinstation 2.1beta4 -----Original Message----- From: Volker Tanger [mailto:volker.tanger-0EXF25N6o/2zQB+pC5nmwQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, 25 June 2004 04:17 p.m. To: thinstation-developer-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cc: vt Subject: [Thinstation-developer] TS via VPN slow? - NX Protocol? Greetings! Working via semi-broadband (768kbit/s) VPN and X11, I am fighting the sluggish performance, as soon as "active" widgets (esp. drag&drop) are used. The X11 roundtrips are killing the performance, as bandwidth requirements are held a bit down by utilizing SSH comnpression. For background info see http://keithp.com/~keithp/talks/usenix2003/html/net.html Has someone heard of NoMachine's NX protocol? Or already had hands-on experience? http://www.linux-kongress.org/2003/abstracts/#3_7_2 http://www.nomachine.com/documentation/intr-technology.php What I read sounds quite good. Could ease LAN infrastructure worries in big installations (hundreds and more of TS against a cluster of servers), as bandwidth requirements seems to be MUCH lower. And home offices consisting of only a X terminal would be usable not just as emergency measure. Code is free and seems to be complete (e.g. available as experimental .DEB package): http://www.nomachine.com/sources.php http://www.kalyxo.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/NoMachineNX Thus I think that would be a great addition to TS - and one differenciating us from the other distribs (LTSP et al). As for VPN I was preferring OpenVPN over IPSec due to better handling of "client" configurations and easier setup on multiple machines and OSes. SSH could be another option, one that allows simple user handling - especially for the Unix crowd. As I'm an X11 guy (sorry RDP/Citrix), I'll set NXclient (session type) as priority 1 for my thinstation activities now - the poor performance over (slow / high latency) is currently the killer argument against far distributed TS installations. As NX is based (network-wise) on SSH, a "real" VPN (IPSec/OpenVPN) is not that important any more... I intend to get NX up and running on my Debian (stable) system first, then build a client package for TS 2.x, before starting to port it over to uclib. Anyone to join in? Bye Volker Tanger ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com _______________________________________________ Thinstation-developer mailing list Thinstation-developer-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/thinstation-developer ================================================== Attention: The information contained in this message and/or attachments is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by person or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you receive this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from your system and destroy any copies. =================================================== |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | TS via VPN slow? - NX Protocol?: 00108, Volker Tanger |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: TS hostname from file and thinstation .runtime.: 00108, Miles Roper |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: TS via VPN slow? - NX Protocol?i: 00108, Kai Schmidt |
| Next by Thread: | RE: TS hostname from file and thinstation .runtime.: 00108, Miles Roper |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |