|
Re: Atom to W3C discussions: msg#00024network.syndication.rss.devel
Hi On Thu 13-May-2004 at 09:22:56PM -0400, Dan Brickley wrote: > > My personal take (well, part of it). RSS1.0 pretty much does it > for me, format-wise. There are a few bugs to fix, but technically > it does the business. Same here, I wonder if we should move RSS 1.0 over to the W3C and in this process get the bugs fixed? Chris -- Chris Croome <chris-u/3R15OTHZFrPLSGMkiIwvXRex20P6io@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> web design http://www.webarchitects.co.uk/ web content management http://mkdoc.com/ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/rss-dev/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: rss-dev-unsubscribe-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Atom to W3C discussions: 00024, Chris Croome |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Atom to W3C discussions: 00024, m . stehle |
| Previous by Thread: | Atom to W3C discussionsi: 00024, Dan Brickley |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Atom to W3C discussions: 00024, m . stehle-RClVtR4NDO2zQB+pC5nmwQ |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |