network.syndication.rss.devel (thread)

Content Syndication with RSS - mini review, Dave Beckett
Autodiscovery case-sensitive?, Klaus Johannes Rusch
- RE: Autodiscovery case-sensitive?, Danny Ayers
  - Re: Autodiscovery case-sensitive?, James Linden
    - Re: Autodiscovery case-sensitive?, Klaus Johannes Rusch
- Re: Autodiscovery case-sensitive?, Bill Kearney
Fw: [XML4LIB] Information Research RSS, James Linden
using URI for values?, Bill Kearney
- Re: using URI for values?, poy_mp3
  - Re: Re: using URI for values?, Bill Kearney
    - RE: Re: using URI for values?, Jon Hanna
    - Re: Re: using URI for values?, Ian Davis
    - Re: Re: using URI for values?, Bill Kearney
    - Re: Re: using URI for values?, Ian Davis
Re: Digest Number 659, Roy M. Silvernail
RSS Including Markup, Doug Ransom
- Re: RSS Including Markup, Bill Kearney
- Re: RSS Including Markup, Ian Davis
  - Re: RSS Including Markup, Doug Ransom
    - Re: RSS Including Markup, Bill Kearney
    - Re: RSS Including Markup, burton
    - RE: RSS Including Markup, Danny Ayers
    - Re: RSS Including Markup, Doug Ransom
Special sneak preview -- 2 Chapters of "Content Syndication with RSS", Jeff Barr
Feedback on your bio XML., burton
XMLTree.com is where?, clintonG
- Re: XMLTree.com is where?, Ian Davis
- XMLTree.com is where?, clintonG
- Re: XMLTree.com is where?, clintonG
  - Re: Re: XMLTree.com is where?, Jeff Barr
  - Re: Re: XMLTree.com is where?, Bill Kearney
Another frivolous feed, Danny Ayers
- RE: Another frivolous feed, Danny Ayers
Remote RSS files, fake_rolex_replica_watch
- RE: Remote RSS files, Danny Ayers
New to this group..., fake_rolex_replica_watch
- Re: New to this group..., Chris Croome
- RE: New to this group..., David LeBlanc
  - Re: New to this group..., fake_rolex_replica_watch
    - Re: Re: New to this group..., Bill Kearney
Something frivolous, Roy M. Silvernail
- RE: Something frivolous, Danny Ayers
- Re: Something frivolous, Roy M. Silvernail
  - Re: Re: Something frivolous, Tom Longson
Sourceforge Adds RSS Feeds, Morbus Iff
RSS and search engines, Danny Ayers
Reviews vocabulary (film, music), Danny Ayers
- Re: Reviews vocabulary (film, music), Morbus Iff
  - RE: Reviews vocabulary (film, music), Danny Ayers
Danny, read this before replying:, djjd42
Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements, Chris Croome
- Re: Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements, Ian Davis
- RE: Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements, Jon Hanna
  - Re: Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements, Bill Kearney
    - RE: Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements, Jon Hanna
    - Re: Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements, Ian Davis
    - RE: Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements, Jon Hanna
    - RE: Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements, Danny Ayers
    - Re: Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements, Bill Kearney
    - Re: Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements, djjd42
    - Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Jon Hanna
    - Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Chris Croome
    - RE: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Danny Ayers
    - Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., djjd42
    - Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., djjd42
    - Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., djjd42
    - RE: Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Danny Ayers
    - Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., djjd42
    - Re: Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Bill Kearney
    - Re: Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Ian Davis
    - RE: Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Jon Hanna
    - Re: Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Bill Kearney
    - RE: Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Jon Hanna
    - RE: Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Danny Ayers
    - Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., djjd42
    - Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., djjd42
    - RE: Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Danny Ayers
    - Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., djjd42
    - Re: Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Bill Kearney
    - Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., djjd42
    - Re: Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Bill Kearney
    - Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., djjd42
    - Re: Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Ian Graham
    - Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., djjd42
    - Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., djjd42
    - RE: Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Jon Hanna
    - Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., djjd42
    - RE: Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Jon Hanna
    - Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., djjd42
    - RE: Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Jon Hanna
    - Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., djjd42
    - Re: Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Bill Kearney
    - RE: Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Jon Hanna
    - Re: Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Bill Kearney
    - Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., djjd42
    - Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., djjd42
    - RE: Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Danny Ayers
    - Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., djjd42
    - Prince Philip and George Michael in a bag together., Jon Hanna
    - Re: Prince Philip and George Michael in a bag together., djjd42
RSS 1.0/2.0, johnny_gunning
- Re: RSS 1.0/2.0, Bill Kearney
  - RE: RSS 1.0/2.0, Danny Ayers
    - Re: RSS 1.0/2.0, Doug Ransom
  - Re: RSS 1.0/2.0, johnny_gunning
brief explanation, andalusin
- Re: brief explanation, Klaus Johannes Rusch
- Re: brief explanation, Bill Kearney
timestamps in syndication module, Bill Kearney
- Re: timestamps in syndication module, Klaus Johannes Rusch
  - Re: timestamps in syndication module, Bill Kearney
    - Re: timestamps in syndication module, Klaus Johannes Rusch
    - Re: timestamps in syndication module, Bill Kearney
    - Re: timestamps in syndication module, Klaus Johannes Rusch
    - Re: timestamps in syndication module, Bill Kearney
    - Re: timestamps in syndication module, Klaus Johannes Rusch
    - RE: timestamps in syndication module, Danny Ayers
    - Re: timestamps in syndication module, Bill Kearney
    - Re: timestamps in syndication module, Bill Kearney
    - Re: timestamps in syndication module, Klaus Johannes Rusch
    - Re: timestamps in syndication module, Bill Kearney
    - Re: timestamps in syndication module, Klaus Johannes Rusch
    - Re: timestamps in syndication module, Bill Kearney
    - Re: timestamps in syndication module, petite_lapin_blue
    - Re: Re: timestamps in syndication module, Bill Kearney
re: comments on the rss article in the washington post, Luka Sherron
RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, petite_lapin_blue
- Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Ben Hammersley
  - Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, petite_lapin_blue
    - Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, petite_lapin_blue
    - RE: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Danny Ayers
    - Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, petite_lapin_blue
    - Re: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Bill Kearney
    - Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, petite_lapin_blue
    - RE: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Danny Ayers
    - Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, petite_lapin_blue
    - Re: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Bill Kearney
    - Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, petite_lapin_blue
    - Re: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Dmitry Jemerov
    - Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, petite_lapin_blue
    - RE: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Danny Ayers
    - Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, petite_lapin_blue
    - RE: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Danny Ayers
    - Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, petite_lapin_blue
    - RE: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Danny Ayers
    - Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, petite_lapin_blue
    - Re: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Bill Kearney
    - RE: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Danny Ayers
    - RE: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Danny Ayers
    - Re: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, mof-rss-dev
    - Re: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Ian Davis
    - Re: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Chris Croome
    - Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, petite_lapin_blue
    - Re: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Bill Kearney
    - Re: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Chris Croome
    - RE: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Jon Hanna
    - Re: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, mof-rss-dev
    - Allowing multiple elements, was: Re: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Chris Croome
    - Re: Allowing multiple elements, was: Re: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Bill Kearney
    - Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, petite_lapin_blue
    - RE: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Jon Hanna
    - Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, petite_lapin_blue
    - Re: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Bill Kearney
    - RE: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Jon Hanna
    - Re: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Bill Kearney
    - RE: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, David Galbraith
    - Re: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Bill Kearney
    - RE: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, David Galbraith
    - Re: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Bill Kearney
- RE: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Cayzer, Steve
- Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, petite_lapin_blue
  - Re: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Bill Kearney
    - RE: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Jon Hanna
    - Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, petite_lapin_blue
- RE: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Cayzer, Steve
- Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, petite_lapin_blue
Press Releases Business Model, Doug Ransom
article in the washington post, Luka Sherron
- Re: article in the washington post, Bill Kearney
  - RE: article in the washington post, Don Park
    - Re: article in the washington post, Dave Winer
    - Re: article in the washington post, Dave Winer
- Re: article in the washington post, clintonG
  - Re: Re: article in the washington post, Dan Brickley
    - Re: Re: article in the washington post, Bill Kearney
    - RE: Re: article in the washington post, Don Park
  - Re: Re: article in the washington post, Dave Winer
  - Re: Re: article in the washington post, Ian Graham
- Re: article in the washington post, clintonG
  - Re: Re: article in the washington post, Dave Winer
  - Re: Re: article in the washington post, Bill Kearney
  - RE: Re: article in the washington post, Danny Ayers
    - Re: Re: article in the washington post, Mark Nottingham
    - RE: Re: article in the washington post, Jon Hanna
Re: RSS for Everyone, markkraft
- RE: Re: RSS for Everyone, Danny Ayers
XML::RSS 1.02, Ian Davis
mod_cc, examples vs spec, kellan
- RE: mod_cc, examples vs spec, Danny Ayers
  - Re: mod_cc, examples vs spec, Ben Hammersley
    - Re: mod_cc, examples vs spec, kelliottmccrea <kellan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: mod_cc, examples vs spec, mof-rss-dev
  - Re: mod_cc, examples vs spec, Ben Hammersley
status of content module?, kellan
Search Engines and Syndication, Doug Ransom
- Re: Search Engines and Syndication, burton
  - Re: Search Engines and Syndication, Phil Ringnalda
  - Re: Search Engines and Syndication, James Linden
Re: RSS Service Status generator, burton