|
|
March 20, 2003
- Re: Re: New to this group..., Bill Kearney
- Re: New to this group..., fake_rolex_replica_watch
- Re: Re: Something frivolous, Tom Longson
- Re: Something frivolous, Roy M. Silvernail
- RE: Something frivolous, Danny Ayers
- RE: Remote RSS files, Danny Ayers
- RE: New to this group..., David LeBlanc
- Re: New to this group..., Chris Croome
- Remote RSS files, fake_rolex_replica_watch
- New to this group..., fake_rolex_replica_watch
- Something frivolous, Roy M. Silvernail
March 14, 2003
- Re: Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Ian Graham
- Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., djjd42
- RE: Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Danny Ayers
- Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., djjd42
- Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., djjd42
- RE: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Danny Ayers
- Re: Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Bill Kearney
- RE: Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Jon Hanna
- Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., djjd42
- Re: Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Bill Kearney
- Re: Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Bill Kearney
- Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., djjd42
- RE: Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Jon Hanna
- Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., djjd42
- Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., djjd42
- Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., djjd42
- RE: Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Jon Hanna
- Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., djjd42
- Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., djjd42
- RE: Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Danny Ayers
- Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., djjd42
- RSS and search engines, Danny Ayers
- Re: RSS 1.0/2.0, Doug Ransom
- Re: Reviews vocabulary (film, music), Morbus Iff
- RE: Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Danny Ayers
- Reviews vocabulary (film, music), Danny Ayers
- RE: Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Jon Hanna
- RE: Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Jon Hanna
- Re: Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Bill Kearney
- Re: Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Bill Kearney
- RE: Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Jon Hanna
- Re: timestamps in syndication module, Bill Kearney
- Re: timestamps in syndication module, Klaus Johannes Rusch
- Re: Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Ian Davis
- Re: Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Bill Kearney
- Re: timestamps in syndication module, Bill Kearney
March 13, 2003
- Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., djjd42
- RE: Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Danny Ayers
- Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., djjd42
- RE: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, David Galbraith
- Danny, read this before replying:, djjd42
- Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., djjd42
- Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., djjd42
- Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., djjd42
- RE: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Danny Ayers
- Re: timestamps in syndication module, Klaus Johannes Rusch
- Re: Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Chris Croome
- Authorship, Bags and Dublin Core. (was Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements)., Jon Hanna
- Re: Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements, djjd42
- Re: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Bill Kearney
- Re: timestamps in syndication module, Bill Kearney
- Re: Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements, Bill Kearney
- RE: Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements, Danny Ayers
- RE: Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements, Jon Hanna
- Re: Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements, Ian Davis
- RE: Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements, Jon Hanna
- Re: Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements, Bill Kearney
- RE: Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements, Jon Hanna
- Re: Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements, Ian Davis
- Motion: modules should be allowed to have repeatable elements, Chris Croome
- Re: RSS 1.0/2.0, johnny_gunning
- RE: RSS 1.0/2.0, Danny Ayers
- RE: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, David Galbraith
- Re: RSS 1.0/2.0, Bill Kearney
- RSS 1.0/2.0, johnny_gunning
March 12, 2003
- Re: Re: timestamps in syndication module, Bill Kearney
- Re: timestamps in syndication module, Bill Kearney
- RE: timestamps in syndication module, Danny Ayers
- Re: timestamps in syndication module, petite_lapin_blue
- Re: timestamps in syndication module, Klaus Johannes Rusch
- Re: timestamps in syndication module, Bill Kearney
- Re: timestamps in syndication module, Klaus Johannes Rusch
- Re: timestamps in syndication module, Bill Kearney
- Re: Allowing multiple elements, was: Re: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Bill Kearney
- Allowing multiple elements, was: Re: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Chris Croome
- Re: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, mof-rss-dev
- Re: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, mof-rss-dev
- RE: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Danny Ayers
- RE: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Jon Hanna
- Re: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Bill Kearney
- Re: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Bill Kearney
- Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, petite_lapin_blue
- RE: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Jon Hanna
- Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, petite_lapin_blue
- Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, petite_lapin_blue
- RE: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Jon Hanna
- Re: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Bill Kearney
- Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, petite_lapin_blue
- RE: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Jon Hanna
- Re: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Chris Croome
- RE: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Cayzer, Steve
- Re: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Bill Kearney
- Re: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Bill Kearney
- Re: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Bill Kearney
- Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, petite_lapin_blue
- RE: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Cayzer, Steve
- Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, petite_lapin_blue
- Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, petite_lapin_blue
- Re: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Chris Croome
- RE: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Danny Ayers
- Re: timestamps in syndication module, Klaus Johannes Rusch
- Re: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Ian Davis
- Re: timestamps in syndication module, Bill Kearney
March 11, 2003
- Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, petite_lapin_blue
- Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, petite_lapin_blue
- RE: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Danny Ayers
- RE: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Danny Ayers
- Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, petite_lapin_blue
- Re: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Dmitry Jemerov
- Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, petite_lapin_blue
- Re: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Bill Kearney
- Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, petite_lapin_blue
- RE: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Danny Ayers
- Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, petite_lapin_blue
- Re: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Bill Kearney
- Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, petite_lapin_blue
- RE: Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Danny Ayers
- Re: brief explanation, Bill Kearney
- Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, petite_lapin_blue
- RE: Re: article in the washington post, Jon Hanna
- Re: brief explanation, Klaus Johannes Rusch
- brief explanation, andalusin
- Re: timestamps in syndication module, Klaus Johannes Rusch
- timestamps in syndication module, Bill Kearney
March 09, 2003
- RE: Re: article in the washington post, Don Park
- Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, petite_lapin_blue
- re: comments on the rss article in the washington post, Luka Sherron
- Re: Re: article in the washington post, Bill Kearney
- Re: RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, Ben Hammersley
- Re: Re: article in the washington post, Ian Graham
- RSS 1.0 equivalent to RSS 2.0 <source> tag?, petite_lapin_blue
- Press Releases Business Model, Doug Ransom
- Re: Re: article in the washington post, Dave Winer
- Re: Re: article in the washington post, Dan Brickley
- Re: article in the washington post, clintonG
- Re: article in the washington post, Dave Winer
- Re: article in the washington post, Dave Winer
- RE: article in the washington post, Don Park
|
|