network.syndication.rss.devel (thread)

reminder tips for creating [1.0] modules, Ken MacLeod
- Re: reminder tips for creating [1.0] modules, jdklub
- Re: reminder tips for creating [1.0] modules, Ken MacLeod
Re: [RSS2-Support] Re: Summary of issue with xmlns attribute, Sam Ruby
- RE: Re: [RSS2-Support] Re: Summary of issue with xmlns attribute, Danny Ayers
- Re: [RSS2-Support] Re: Summary of issue with xmlns attribute, Sam Ruby
- RE: Re: [RSS2-Support] Re: Summary of issue with xmlns attribute, Jon Hanna
mod_trackback, jdklub
- Re: mod_trackback, James Linden
  - Re: mod_trackback, jdklub
    - Re: Re: mod_trackback, James Linden
  - RE: mod_trackback, Danny Ayers
Fw: Namespaces in RSS 2.0, Dave Winer
- Namespaces in RSS 2.0, Sam Ruby
  - Re: Namespaces in RSS 2.0, Dan Brickley
    - Re: Namespaces in RSS 2.0, Seth Russell
    - Re: Namespaces in RSS 2.0, burton
    - Re: Namespaces in RSS 2.0, Bill Kearney
  - Re: Namespaces in RSS 2.0, burton
- Namespaces in RSS 2.0, Dave Winer
  - Re: Namespaces in RSS 2.0, Shelley Powers
    - RE: Re: Namespaces in RSS 2.0, Jon Hanna
- Re: Namespaces in RSS 2.0, Sam Ruby
  - Re: Namespaces in RSS 2.0, Andy Powell
    - Re: Namespaces in RSS 2.0, Ben Hammersley
    - Re: Namespaces in RSS 2.0, mof-rss-dev
    - Re: Namespaces in RSS 2.0, Ben Hammersley
    - Re: Namespaces in RSS 2.0, Bill Kearney
  - Re: Namespaces in RSS 2.0, Sam Ruby
RSS in N3 (Redux), Morbus Iff
- RE: RSS in N3 (Redux), Jon Hanna
Speak of the devil, Dave Winer
- Re: Speak of the devil, Eric van der Vlist
  - Re: Speak of the devil, Dave Winer
- Re: Speak of the devil, Shelley Powers
- Re: Speak of the devil, Shelley Powers
  - Re: Re: Speak of the devil, Dan Brickley
  - OT: Re: Speak of the devil, Bill Kearney
  - RE: Re: Speak of the devil, Jon Hanna
  - Re: Re: Speak of the devil, Bill Kearney
- Re: Speak of the devil, Joseph Reagle
- RE: Re: Speak of the devil, Sam Ruby
newbie question, Ismail KIRTILLI
- RE: newbie question, Jon Hanna
[OT] My Motivations and AmphetaDesk's Future, Morbus Iff
Move on, Dave Winer
- Re: Move on, tappnel
OT: Feel free to skip, jdklub
Elements at same level as <channel>, Dave Winer
- Re: Elements at same level as <channel>, Ben Hammersley
  - Re: Elements at same level as <channel>, tappnel
- Re: Elements at same level as <channel>, Eric Vitiello
Namespace Extension in RSS 2.0, Sean B. Palmer
- RE: Namespace Extension in RSS 2.0, Jon Hanna
- Re: Namespace Extension in RSS 2.0, Dave Winer
RSS directory, Dave Winer
- Re: RSS directory, jdklub
Dan's special case, Dave Winer
Responses to Sean Palmer's comments, Dave Winer
- Re: Responses to Sean Palmer's comments, Dan Brickley
  - Re: Responses to Sean Palmer's comments, tappnel
- Re: Responses to Sean Palmer's comments, Sean B. Palmer
  - Namespaces in RSS 2.0, Dave Winer
RDF calendar workshop, Bristol, UK, 2002-10-09, Libby Miller
Sean's comments, Dave Winer
Numbers, Dave Winer
- Re: Numbers, James Linden
Good joke Ben, Dave Winer
Disclaimer, Dave Winer
- Re: Disclaimer, Marcus Campbell
- RE: Disclaimer, pw-yahoogroups
- Re: Disclaimer, Leandro Mariano Lopez
- Re: Disclaimer, Bill Kearney
  - Re: Re: Disclaimer, Morbus Iff
    - OT: Re: Disclaimer, Bill Kearney
RE: OT - Observation, Eric Vitiello
Observation, Dave Winer
- Re: Observation, Eric van der Vlist
  - RE: OT - Observation, Jon Hanna
  - Re: Observation, Ben Hammersley
- Re: Observation, Marcus Campbell
- Re: Observation, Dave Winer
  - Re: Re: Observation, Ben Hammersley
    - Re: Re: Observation, Phil Ringnalda
    - Re: Re: Observation, Mike Krus
Transparency is essential, Dave Winer
- Re: Transparency is essential, Bill Kearney
Semi-OT - Some Thoughts On Simplicity, Jon Hanna
- Re: Semi-OT - Some Thoughts On Simplicity, Phil Ringnalda
  - RE: Semi-OT - Some Thoughts On Simplicity, Jon Hanna
[updated] Extending RSS 2.0 With Namespaces, Morbus Iff
[ann] Extending RSS 2.0 With Namespaces, Morbus Iff
- Re: [ann] Extending RSS 2.0 With Namespaces, dondppark
- RE: [ann] Extending RSS 2.0 With Namespaces, Jon Hanna
Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question), Morbus Iff
- Re: Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question), Dan Brickley
  - Re: Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question), Ben Hammersley
  - Re: Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question), Morbus Iff
    - Re: Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question), Ben Hammersley
    - Re: Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question), Morbus Iff
    - Re: Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question), Ben Hammersley
    - Re: Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question), Morbus Iff
    - Re: Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question), Ben Hammersley
    - Re: Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question), Ben Hammersley
    - Re: Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question), dondppark
    - Re: Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question), Phil Ringnalda
    - Re: Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question), Ben Hammersley
    - Re: Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question), Marcus Campbell
    - Re: Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question), mof-rss-dev
    - Re: Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question), Libby Miller
    - Re: Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question), mof-rss-dev
    - Re: Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question), Dan Brickley
  - RE: Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question), David Galbraith
- Re: Why is RSS 2.0 Bad?, Sean B. Palmer
Cramming a world of RDF into RSS -- or not., Ken MacLeod
- Re: Cramming a world of RDF into RSS -- or not., Bill Kearney
Is this valid?, Bill Kearney
- RE: Is this valid?, Jon Hanna
  - Re: Is this valid?, Bill Kearney
    - RE: Is this valid?, Jon Hanna
    - Re: Is this valid?, Bill Kearney
  - Re: Is this valid?, Bill Kearney
Apologies, Shelley Powers
- Re: Apologies, Morbus Iff
Merge threads - who, what, why, Shelley Powers
- RE: Merge threads - who, what, why, Danny Ayers
  - Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Shelley Powers
    - Re: Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Seth Russell
    - Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Shelley Powers
    - RE: Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Ziv Caspi
    - Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Shelley Powers
    - Re: Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Dan Brickley
    - Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Shelley Powers
    - Re: Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Dan Brickley
    - RE: Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Jon Hanna
    - Re: Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Seth Russell
    - RE: Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Danny Ayers
    - Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Shelley Powers
    - RE: Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Danny Ayers
    - Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Shelley Powers
  - Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Shelley Powers
- RE: Merge threads - who, what, why, Bradley P. Allen
  - Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Bill Kearney
    - Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Shelley Powers
    - RE: Merge threads - who, what, why, Bradley P. Allen
  - Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Shelley Powers
    - RE: Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Bradley P. Allen
    - Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Shelley Powers
    - RE: Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Bradley P. Allen
    - Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Shelley Powers
- Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, DJ Adams
  - Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Shelley Powers
    - Re: Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, DJ Adams
    - Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Shelley Powers
    - RE: Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Bradley P. Allen
    - Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Shelley Powers
    - RE: Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Danny Ayers
    - RE: Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Bradley P. Allen
    - Re: Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, DJ Adams
    - Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Michael S. Manley
MacOS X RSS users BOF next week, Dan Brickley
- Re: MacOS X RSS users BOF next week, burton
  - Re: MacOS X RSS users BOF next week, burton
- Re: MacOS X RSS users BOF next week, Rael Dornfest
  - OT: #rss on irc.openprojects.net, Paul Kelly
mod_taxonomy vs dc:subject?, Bill Kearney
request: dcterms not listed in proposed modules?, Bill Kearney
mod_link and source info?, Bill Kearney
- Re: mod_link and source info?, burton
  - Re: mod_link and source info?, Bill Kearney
    - Re: mod_link and source info?, burton
    - Re: mod_link and source info?, mof-rss-dev
    - Re: mod_link and source info?, burton
    - Re: mod_link and source info?, mof-rss-dev
    - Re: mod_link and source info?, Bill Kearney
    - Re: mod_link and source info?, burton
    - Re: mod_link and source info?, mof-rss-dev
tap namespace / RSS use case, Dan Brickley
The Focus Discussion (was Re: Time for a name change?), Ben Hammersley
- Re: The Focus Discussion (was Re: Time for a name change?), Joseph Reagle
  - The Focus Discussion (was Re: Time for a name change?), tappnel
    - Re: The Focus Discussion (was Re: Time for a name change?), Dan Brickley
    - RE: The Focus Discussion (was Re: Time for a name change?), Danny Ayers
- RE: The Focus Discussion (was Re: Time for a name change?), Jon Hanna
rdf an id attributes, Bill Kearney
- Re: rdf an id attributes, Dave Beckett
  - RE: rdf an id attributes, Jon Hanna
- Re: rdf an id attributes, burton
Apology, funzelkick
- RE: Apology, Jon Hanna
  - RE: Apology, Danny Ayers
sorry but i need help!, nisrine_tazi
A year-zero strawman., Jon Hanna
- Re: A year-zero strawman., Joe Gregorio
  - Re: A year-zero strawman., Chris Croome
    - Re: A year-zero strawman., Ben Hammersley
    - Re: A year-zero strawman., Dan Brickley
    - Re: A year-zero strawman., Ben Hammersley
    - Re: A year-zero strawman., Dan Brickley
    - RE: A year-zero strawman., Jon Hanna
    - RE: A year-zero strawman., Dan Brickley
    - RE: A year-zero strawman., Jon Hanna
    - Re: A year-zero strawman., Bill Kearney
  - RE: A year-zero strawman., Jon Hanna
    - Re: A year-zero strawman., DJ Adams
    - RE: A year-zero strawman., pw-yahoogroups
    - RE: A year-zero strawman., Danny Ayers
    - RE: A year-zero strawman., Jon Hanna
    - Re: A year-zero strawman., tappnel
    - RE: Re: A year-zero strawman., Danny Ayers
    - Re: A year-zero strawman., tappnel
    - RE: Re: A year-zero strawman., Jon Hanna
    - RE: Re: A year-zero strawman., Danny Ayers
    - RE: Re: A year-zero strawman., Jon Hanna
    - RE: A year-zero strawman., Peter Wilkinson
    - RE: A year-zero strawman., Jon Hanna
    - RE: A year-zero strawman., Peter Wilkinson
    - Re: A year-zero strawman., Joe Gregorio
- Re: A year-zero strawman., mof-rss-dev
  - Re: A year-zero strawman., Bill Kearney
    - Re: A year-zero strawman., mof-rss-dev
    - Re: A year-zero strawman., Bill Kearney
    - RE: A year-zero strawman., Jon Hanna
    - Re: A year-zero strawman., Phil Ringnalda
    - Re: A year-zero strawman., Bill Kearney
  - RE: A year-zero strawman., Jon Hanna
    - Re: A year-zero strawman., Morten Frederiksen
    - RE: A year-zero strawman., Jon Hanna
- rdf:about="" [was: Re: A year-zero strawman.], Sean B. Palmer
  - Re: rdf:about="" [was: Re: A year-zero strawman.], Chris Croome
    - Re: rdf:about="" [was: Re: A year-zero strawman.], Bill Kearney
    - Re: rdf:about="" [was: Re: A year-zero strawman.], Chris Croome
    - Re: rdf:about="" [was: Re: A year-zero strawman.], Lachlan Cannon
  - rdf:about="" [was: Re: A year-zero strawman.], Bill Kearney
Re: The Problem with rdf:Seq [was: Re: Time for a name change?], Dave Beckett
RelaxNG Schema for RSS 1.0 Core, Joseph Reagle
- Fwd: Re: RelaxNG Schema for RSS 1.0 Core, Joseph Reagle
  - Re: Fwd: Re: RelaxNG Schema for RSS 1.0 Core, Bill Kearney
    - Re: Fwd: Re: RelaxNG Schema for RSS 1.0 Core, Joseph Reagle
RSS 1.0 for scripting.com, burton
publish and subscribe, Ben Hammersley
Time for a name change?, Bill Kearney
- Re: Time for a name change?, Sean B. Palmer
  - Re: Time for a name change?, Bill Kearney
- Re: Time for a name change?, James Linden
- Re: Time for a name change?, Eric van der Vlist
  - Re: Time for a name change?, Ben Hammersley
    - Re: Time for a name change?, Bill Kearney
    - Re: Time for a name change?, Joe Gregorio
    - Re: Re: Time for a name change?, Dan Brickley
    - Re: Re: Time for a name change?, Seth Russell
    - Re: Re: Time for a name change?, Bill Kearney
    - Re: Re: Time for a name change?, Ben Hammersley
    - Re: Re: Time for a name change?, Dan Brickley
    - Re: Re: Time for a name change?, Dan Brickley
    - Re: Time for a name change?, Shelley Powers
    - Re: Re: Time for a name change?, Bill Kearney
    - Re: Time for a name change?, Shelley Powers
    - RE: Re: Time for a name change?, Jon Hanna
    - Re: Re: Time for a name change?, Bill Kearney
    - Re: Time for a name change?, tappnel
    - RE: Re: Time for a name change?, Danny Ayers
    - Re: Time for a name change?, Shelley Powers
    - RE: Re: Time for a name change?, Danny Ayers
    - Re: Time for a name change?, tappnel
    - RE: Re: Time for a name change?, Jon Hanna
    - Re: Time for a name change?, tappnel
    - Re: Re: Time for a name change?, Bill Kearney
    - Who are we and what are we trying to accomplish anyway ?, Seth Russell
    - Re: Who are we and what are we trying to accomplish anyway ?, Joseph Reagle
    - Re: Who are we and what are we trying to accomplish anyway ?, Dan Brickley
    - Re: Who are we and what are we trying to accomplish anyway ?, Dan Brickley
    - Re: Who are we and what are we trying to accomplish anyway ?, Joseph Reagle
    - Re: Who are we and what are we trying to accomplish anyway ?, Eric van der Vlist
    - Re: Who are we and what are we trying to accomplish anyway ?, Dan Brickley
    - Re: Who are we and what are we trying to accomplish anyway ?, Dan Brickley
    - Re: Who are we and what are we trying to accomplish anyway ?, Joseph Reagle
    - Re: Who are we and what are we trying to accomplish anyway ?, tappnel
    - Re: Who are we and what are we trying to accomplish anyway ?, tappnel
    - Re: Re: Who are we and what are we trying to accomplish anyway ?, Eric van der Vlist
    - Re: Who are we and what are we trying to accomplish anyway ?, Bill Kearney
    - Re: Who are we and what are we trying to accomplish anyway ?, Ian Graham
    - Re: Who are we and what are we trying to accomplish anyway ?, Seth Russell
    - Re: Who are we and what are we trying to accomplish anyway ?, Ian Graham
    - Re: Who are we and what are we trying to accomplish anyway ?, Seth Russell
    - Re: Who are we and what are we trying to accomplish anyway ?, Ian Graham
    - Re: Who are we and what are we trying to accomplish anyway ?, Phil Ringnalda
    - Re: Who are we and what are we trying to accomplish anyway ?, Ian Graham
    - Re: Re: Time for a name change?, Bill Kearney
    - Re: Time for a name change?, tappnel
    - Re: Re: Time for a name change?, Bill Kearney
- Re: Time for a name change?, Michael S. Manley
- Re: Time for a name change?, Joseph Reagle
  - Re: Time for a name change?, Ben Hammersley
    - RE: Time for a name change?, Danny Ayers
    - Re: Time for a name change?, Ben Hammersley
    - Re: Time for a name change?, Dan Brickley
    - RE: Time for a name change?, David Galbraith
    - General SYN (was RE: Time for a name change?), Danny Ayers
    - RE: General SYN (was RE: Time for a name change?), Jon Hanna
    - Re: Time for a name change?, Bill Kearney
    - RE: Time for a name change?, Ziv Caspi
    - Re: Time for a name change?, Morten Frederiksen
    - Re: Time for a name change?, Joseph Reagle
    - Re: Time for a name change?, Eric van der Vlist
    - Re: Time for a name change?, Bill Kearney
    - Re: Time for a name change?, Bill Kearney
    - Re: Time for a name change?, James Linden
    - Re: Time for a name change?, Ben Hammersley
    - Re: Time for a name change?, Bill Kearney
    - Re: Time for a name change?, e_vitiello_jr
    - Re: Re: Time for a name change?, Joseph Reagle
    - RE: Re: Time for a name change?, Danny Ayers
    - RE: Re: Time for a name change?, Jon Hanna
    - RE: Re: Time for a name change?, Danny Ayers
    - Re: Re: Time for a name change?, Joseph Reagle
    - RE: Re: Time for a name change?, Jon Hanna
  - Re: Time for a name change?, Joe Gregorio
- Re: Time for a name change?, Morten Frederiksen
- Re: Time for a name change?, burton
  - Re: Time for a name change?, Bill Kearney
- Re: Time for a name change?, Eric Vitiello Jr.
  - RE: Time for a name change?, Jon Hanna
- RE: Re: Time for a name change?, Eric Vitiello Jr.
  - RE: Re: Time for a name change?, Jon Hanna
    - Re: Re: Time for a name change?, Ben Hammersley
    - RE: Re: Time for a name change?, Jon Hanna
    - The Problem with rdf:Seq [was: Re: Time for a name change?], Sean B. Palmer
    - RE: The Problem with rdf:Seq [was: Re: Time for a name change?], Danny Ayers
    - Re: The Problem with rdf:Seq [was: Re: Time for a name change?], Dave Beckett
    - RE: The Problem with rdf:Seq [was: Re: Time for a name change?], Danny Ayers
    - The Problem with rdf:Seq [was: Re: Time for a name change?], Sjoerd Visscher
    - The Problem with rdf:Seq [was: Re: Time for a name change?], Joe Gregorio
    - RE: The Problem with rdf:Seq [was: Re: Time for a name change?], Jon Hanna
    - RE: Re: Time for a name change?, Danny Ayers
  - RE: Re: Time for a name change?, Peter Wilkinson
    - Re: Re: Time for a name change?, Joseph Reagle
    - RE: Re: Time for a name change?, Jon Hanna
    - RE: Re: Time for a name change?, Danny Ayers
    - Re: Re: Time for a name change?, James Linden
    - RE: Re: Time for a name change?, Jon Hanna
    - Re: Re: Time for a name change?, Bill Kearney
    - RE: Re: Time for a name change?, Jon Hanna
    - Re: Time for a name change?, tappnel
    - RE: Re: Time for a name change?, Ziv Caspi
    - Re: Re: Time for a name change?, Bill Kearney
- Re: Time for a name change?, kellan
- RE: Re: Time for a name change?, Eric Vitiello Jr.
Guilt by association?, Bill Kearney
- Re: Guilt by association?, jdklub
  - Re: Re: Guilt by association?, Jeff Barr
    - Re: Guilt by association?, funzelkick
    - Re: Re: Guilt by association?, Ian Davis
    - Re: Guilt by association?, Bill Kearney
    - RE: Re: Guilt by association?, Jon Hanna
blog comments feed, Ben Hammersley
relating rss namespace(s) to other vocabulary, Dan Brickley
Shelley on RDF, Bill Kearney
RSS 2.0: Restriction on Whitespace in <link>|<url>, Morbus Iff
- RE: RSS 2.0: Restriction on Whitespace in <link>|<url>, Danny Ayers
  - RE: RSS 2.0: Restriction on Whitespace in <link>|<url>, Morbus Iff
RSS 2.0: "Subsequent Works", Morbus Iff
- Re: RSS 2.0: "Subsequent Works", Seth Russell
  - Re: RSS 2.0: "Subsequent Works", Morbus Iff
Tutorial on buiding an aggregator with Python, Leandro Mariano Lopez
New members ahoy!, Ben Hammersley
- Re: New members ahoy!, Libby Miller
  - Re: New members ahoy!, burton
Bugzilla and Wiki, ldodds
- Re: Bugzilla and Wiki, burton
  - Re: Bugzilla and Wiki, Dan Brickley
  - Re: Bugzilla and Wiki, Aaron Swartz
    - Re: Bugzilla and Wiki, Ian Graham
    - RE: Bugzilla and Wiki, David LeBlanc
    - RE: Bugzilla and Wiki, Dan Brickley
- Re: Bugzilla and Wiki, Eric van der Vlist
module docs need fixing, Bill Kearney
- Re: module docs need fixing, Chris Croome
version missing in mod link and sub, Bill Kearney
schemas for modules?, Bill Kearney
- Re: schemas for modules?, Eric van der Vlist
  - Re: schemas for modules?, Bill Kearney
    - Re: schemas for modules?, Eric van der Vlist
    - Re: schemas for modules?, Bill Kearney
    - Re: schemas for modules?, Libby Miller
    - Re: schemas for modules?, Dan Brickley
    - Re: schemas for modules?, Bill Kearney
    - RE: schemas for modules?, Jon Hanna
    - RE: schemas for modules?, Eric van der Vlist
    - RE: schemas for modules?, Jon Hanna
    - RE: schemas for modules?, Eric van der Vlist
    - RE: schemas for modules?, Jon Hanna
    - RE: schemas for modules?, Eric van der Vlist
    - Re: schemas for modules?, Bill Kearney
    - Re: schemas for modules?, Eric van der Vlist
    - RE: schemas for modules?, Jon Hanna
    - RE: schemas for modules?, Eric van der Vlist
    - RE: schemas for modules?, Jon Hanna
    - Re: schemas for modules?, Bill Kearney
    - Re: schemas for modules?, Bill Kearney
    - Re: schemas for modules?, Eric van der Vlist
    - RE: schemas for modules?, Jon Hanna
    - RE: schemas for modules?, Eric van der Vlist
    - Re: schemas for modules?, Bill Kearney
    - Re: schemas for modules?, Bill Kearney
Nice article by DJ Adams, Leigh Dodds
Poll results for rss-dev, rss-dev-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw
busted purl, Bill Kearney
- Re: busted purl, Chris Croome
purl refinements?, Bill Kearney
New poll for rss-dev, rss-dev-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw
- Re: New poll for rss-dev, Bill Kearney
  - Re: New poll for rss-dev, Chris Croome
  - RE: New poll for rss-dev, Jon Hanna
    - Re: New poll for rss-dev, Chris Croome
    - Re: New poll for rss-dev, Bill Kearney
    - Re: New poll for rss-dev, Chris Croome
    - RE: New poll for rss-dev, Jon Hanna
    - Re: New poll for rss-dev, Bill Kearney
    - Re: New poll for rss-dev, Chris Croome
    - Re: New poll for rss-dev, Bill Kearney
- Re: New poll for rss-dev, Eric van der Vlist
  - Re: New poll for rss-dev, Chris Croome
    - Re: New poll for rss-dev, Eric van der Vlist
  - Re: New poll for rss-dev, Bill Kearney
    - value add (was RE: New poll for rss-dev), Danny Ayers
    - RE: value add (was RE: New poll for rss-dev), Jon Hanna
- Re: New poll for rss-dev, Ken MacLeod
  - RE: Re: New poll for rss-dev, Jon Hanna
    - Procedures (was: New poll for rss-dev), Eric van der Vlist
    - RE: Procedures (was: New poll for rss-dev), Jon Hanna
    - Re: Multiple occurences, Morten Frederiksen
- Re: New poll for rss-dev, Ken MacLeod
  - RE: Re: New poll for rss-dev, Leigh Dodds
- Re: New poll for rss-dev, Ken MacLeod
  - RE: Re: New poll for rss-dev, Jon Hanna
  - Re: Re: New poll for rss-dev, Dan Brickley
- Re: New poll for rss-dev, Ken MacLeod
  - Re: Use cases, Morten Frederiksen
  - RE: Re: New poll for rss-dev, Jon Hanna
    - Re: Re: New poll for rss-dev, Bill Kearney
    - RE: Re: New poll for rss-dev, Jon Hanna
    - Re: Re: New poll for rss-dev, Morten Frederiksen
    - RE: Re: New poll for rss-dev, Jon Hanna
    - Re: Re: New poll for rss-dev, Morten Frederiksen
How should I represent multiple subjects in my RSS1.0 feed?, Simon Willison
- Re: How should I represent multiple subjects in my RSS1.0 feed?, Chris Croome
  - Splitting the lists?, Bill Kearney
    - Re: Splitting the lists?, Eric van der Vlist
    - Re: Splitting the lists?, Morten Frederiksen
  - Re: How should I represent multiple subjects in my RSS1.0 feed?, Phil Ringnalda
    - Re: How should I represent multiple subjects in my RSS1.0 feed?, Bill Kearney
[LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, burton
- Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, Eric van der Vlist
  - Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, Bill Kearney
    - RE: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, Danny Ayers
    - RE: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, Jon Hanna
    - RE: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, Eric van der Vlist
    - Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, burton
    - Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, Eric van der Vlist
    - Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, burton
    - Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, Sjoerd Visscher
    - Re: Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, burton
    - Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, Bill Kearney
    - Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, Morten Frederiksen
    - Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, burton
    - Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, Bill Kearney
    - Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, burton
    - RE: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, Danny Ayers
    - Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, burton
    - RE: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, Danny Ayers
    - Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, burton
    - RE: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, Jon Hanna
    - Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, burton
    - Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, burton
    - RE: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, Danny Ayers
    - Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, burton
  - Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, burton
    - Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, Eric van der Vlist
- Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, kelliottmccrea
  - RE: Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, Jon Hanna
    - Re: Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, Bill Kearney
    - RE: Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, Danny Ayers
    - Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, kelliottmccrea
  - Re: Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, burton
    - Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, kelliottmccrea
RSS 0.94/2.0 to RDF converter, Sjoerd Visscher
Which syndication format should I use?, Simon Willison
- Re: Which syndication format should I use?, Chris Croome
  - Re: Which syndication format should I use?, Bill Kearney
    - RSS MIME type - application/rss+xml was: [Re: Which syndication format should I use?], Chris Croome
    - Re: RSS MIME type - application/rss+xml was: [Re: Which syndication format should I use?], Ben Hammersley
    - Re: RSS MIME type - application/rss+xml was: [Re: Which syndication format should I use?], Mark Nottingham
    - RE: RSS MIME type - application/rss+xml was: [Re: Which syndication format should I use?], Jon Hanna
    - Re: RSS MIME type - application/rss+xml was: [Re: Which syndication format should I use?], Ben Hammersley
    - Re: RSS MIME type - application/rss+xml was: [Re: Which syndication format should I use?], burton
    - RE: RSS MIME type - application/rss+xml was: [Re: Which syndication format should I use?], Jon Hanna
    - Re: RSS MIME type - application/rss+xml was: [Re: Which syndication format should I use?], Chris Croome
    - Re: RSS MIME type - application/rss+xml was: [Re: Which syndication format should I use?], Mark Nottingham
    - Re: RSS MIME type - application/rss+xml was: [Re: Which syndication format should I use?], burton
- Re: Which syndication format should I use?, Bill Kearney
  - Re: Which syndication format should I use?, Simon Willison
fyi) recent rdf working draft, Bill Kearney
restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
- RE: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Jon Hanna
  - Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
    - RE: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Jon Hanna
    - Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
    - RE: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Leigh Dodds
    - RE: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Eric van der Vlist
    - RE: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Jon Hanna
    - RE: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Eric van der Vlist
    - RE: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Jon Hanna
    - Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Joseph Reagle
    - Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Eric van der Vlist
    - Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
    - Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
    - Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Joseph Reagle
    - Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Joseph Reagle
    - Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Joseph Reagle
    - RE: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Libby Miller
    - Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
    - RE: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Leigh Dodds
    - RE: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Leigh Dodds
    - Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
    - RE: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Leigh Dodds
    - Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
    - Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Joseph Reagle
    - Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
    - RE: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Jon Hanna
    - Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
    - Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Ian Graham
    - Summarizing restructuring Purls to reflect version number, Bill Kearney
    - Re: Summarizing restructuring Purls to reflect version number, Morten Frederiksen
    - Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
    - Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Joseph Reagle
    - Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Ian Graham
    - RE: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Ian Graham
    - Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
    - RE: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Leigh Dodds
    - Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
    - RE: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Jon Hanna
    - Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
    - RE: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Andy Powell
    - Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
    - RE: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Jon Hanna
    - Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
    - RE: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Jon Hanna
    - Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
    - Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Eric van der Vlist
    - Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
    - Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, ldodds
    - Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Chris Croome
    - Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Eric van der Vlist
    - Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
    - RE: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Jon Hanna
    - Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
    - RE: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Jon Hanna
    - Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
Re: [syndication] Dave Winer's RSS 2.0, Morbus Iff
Dave Winer's RSS 2.0, Chris Croome
- Re: Dave Winer's RSS 2.0, Eric van der Vlist
- DW's RSS 2.0 is (possibly) RDF Compatible [was: Dave Winer's RSS 2.0], Sean B. Palmer
  - RE: DW's RSS 2.0 is (possibly) RDF Compatible [was: Dave Winer's RSS 2.0], Jon Hanna
    - Re: DW's RSS 2.0 is (possibly) RDF Compatible, Sean B. Palmer
- Re: Dave Winer's RSS 2.0, Joe Gregorio
  - Re: Dave Winer's RSS 2.0, Eric van der Vlist
    - Re: Dave Winer's RSS 2.0, Libby Miller
    - Re: Dave Winer's RSS 2.0, Dan Brickley
  - RE: Dave Winer's RSS 2.0, Jon Hanna
    - Re: Dave Winer's RSS 2.0, Ben Hammersley
namespace idea?, Bill Kearney
- RE: namespace idea?, Leigh Dodds
  - RE: namespace idea?, Dan Brickley
Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], Ben Hammersley
- Re: Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], Bill Kearney
  - Order (was Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal), Eric van der Vlist
    - Re: Order (was Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal), Bill Kearney
Break out into multiple mailing lists?, burton
A note on namespaces, Dan Brickley
- Re: A note on namespaces, Ian Graham
Why not separate the RSS part form the RDF part?, Seth Russell
- Re: Why not separate the RSS part form the RDF part?, Dan Brickley
  - Re: Why not separate the RSS part form the RDF part?, Seth Russell
    - RE: Why not separate the RSS part form the RDF part?, Danny Ayers
    - Re: Why not separate the RSS part form the RDF part?, burton
process: please include poster attributions when quoting mail, Dan Brickley
RSS and WAP/WML... lessons re HTML and RDF and format divergence?, Dan Brickley
- Re: RSS and WAP/WML... lessons re HTML and RDF and format divergence?, p2psmoke
rss-dev old msgs, Libby Miller
- Extracting email from Yahoo groups [Was: Re: rss-dev old msgs], Chris Croome
  - Re: Extracting email from Yahoo groups [Was: Re: rss-dev old msgs], Libby Miller
wrap-up, Eric van der Vlist
- Re: wrap-up, ldodds
[BLOG/LONG] The End of RSS Innocence, burton
legit way to express rdf?, Bill Kearney
- RE: legit way to express rdf?, Jon Hanna
- Re: legit way to express rdf?, Chris Croome
W3C xml namespaces last call, Bill Kearney
- Suggestions for the future..., Morten Frederiksen
  - Re: Suggestions for the future..., Joe Gregorio
    - RE: Suggestions for the future..., Jon Hanna
  - Re: Suggestions for the future..., Eric van der Vlist
  - RE: Suggestions for the future..., Jon Hanna
    - Re: Suggestions for the future..., Chris Croome
    - Re: Suggestions for the future..., burton
  - Re: Suggestions for the future..., Bill Kearney
    - Re: Suggestions for the future..., Morten Frederiksen
    - Re: Suggestions for the future..., Bill Kearney
    - Re: Suggestions for the future..., burton
    - CSS PURL [Was: Re: Suggestions for the future...], Chris Croome
Article from IEEE Spectrum on Semantic Web, Jon Hanna
- Convergence at last!, Jon Hanna
  - Re: Convergence at last!, Bill Kearney
All PURLs should point to web.resource.org, burton
richer content without mod_content?, Bill Kearney
- RE: richer content without mod_content?, Jon Hanna
  - Re: richer content without mod_content?, Bill Kearney
    - RE: richer content without mod_content?, Jon Hanna
- Re: richer content without mod_content?, burton
discussion on dcterms date usage?, Bill Kearney
- Re: discussion on dcterms date usage?, Morten Frederiksen
  - RE: discussion on dcterms date usage?, Jon Hanna
    - Re: discussion on dcterms date usage?, Bill Kearney
    - Re: discussion on dcterms date usage?, Chris Croome
    - Re: discussion on dcterms date usage?, Bill Kearney
    - DCMI Period Encoding [Was: Re: discussion on dcterms date usage?], Chris Croome
    - RE: discussion on dcterms date usage?, Jon Hanna
  - Re: discussion on dcterms date usage?, Bill Kearney
    - Re: discussion on dcterms date usage?, Morten Frederiksen
    - Re: discussion on dcterms date usage?, Bill Kearney
    - Re: discussion on dcterms date usage?, Morten Frederiksen
expressing dates effectively in RSS-1.0?, Bill Kearney
- RE: expressing dates effectively in RSS-1.0?, Jon Hanna
  - Re: expressing dates effectively in RSS-1.0?, Bill Kearney
The mission of RSS., tappnel
Practical advice about generating RSS, Mike_McCracken_PSU
- Re: Practical advice about generating RSS, Mike_McCracken_PSU
  - Re: Practical advice about generating RSS, Mike_McCracken_PSU
- Re: Practical advice about generating RSS, Bill Kearney
- Re: Practical advice about generating RSS, Bill Kearney
Time to move along?, Eric van der Vlist
- RE: Time to move along?, Jon Hanna
  - RE: Time to move along?, Eric van der Vlist
    - RE: Time to move along?, Jon Hanna
    - RE: Time to move along?, Eric van der Vlist
    - RE: Time to move along?, Jon Hanna
    - RE: Time to move along?, Eric van der Vlist
    - RE: Time to move along?, Jon Hanna
    - RE: Time to move along?, Eric van der Vlist
    - RE: Time to move along?, Jon Hanna
    - Re: Time to move along?, Bill Kearney
    - RE: Time to move along?, Ziv Caspi
    - Re: Time to move along?, Bill Kearney
    - Re: Time to move along?, Joe Gregorio
    - RE: Time to move along?, ldodds
    - RE: Time to move along?, Eric van der Vlist
    - RE: Time to move along?, ldodds
    - RE: Time to move along?, Jon Hanna
    - Re: Time to move along?, Bill Kearney
    - RE: Time to move along?, Jon Hanna
- re: Time to move along?, Rael Dornfest
  - RE: re: Time to move along?, Leigh Dodds
    - Re: re: Time to move along?, Ian Davis
  - Re: re: Time to move along?, Eric van der Vlist
    - RE: re: Time to move along?, Jon Hanna
    - Re: re: Time to move along?, Bill Kearney
    - RE: re: Time to move along?, Jon Hanna
    - RE: re: Time to move along?, Eric van der Vlist
    - RE: re: Time to move along?, Leigh Dodds
    - RE: re: Time to move along?, Eric van der Vlist
    - Re: re: Time to move along?, Bill Kearney
    - Re: re: Time to move along?, ldodds
    - RE: re: Time to move along?, Ziv Caspi
    - RE: re: Time to move along?, Jon Hanna
    - RE: re: Time to move along?, David Galbraith
    - RE: re: Time to move along?, Jon Hanna
    - RE: re: Time to move along?, David Galbraith
    - RE: re: Time to move along?, ldodds
    - RE: re: Time to move along?, Eric van der Vlist
    - Re: re: Time to move along?, Chris Croome
    - Re: re: Time to move along?, Rael Dornfest
    - Re: re: Time to move along?, Eric van der Vlist
    - Re: re: Time to move along?, Rael Dornfest
    - Re: Time to move along?, p2psmoke
    - Re: re: Time to move along?, Eric van der Vlist
    - Re: re: Time to move along?, Bill Kearney
    - need opml file help, Paul Baker
    - Re: re: Time to move along?, Rael Dornfest
    - Multi-namespace architecture, cost etc (was re: Time to move along?), Dan Brickley
    - Re: Multi-namespace architecture, cost etc (was re: Time to move along?), Bill Kearney
    - Re: re: Time to move along?, Joe Gregorio
    - RE: re: Time to move along?, Eric van der Vlist
    - RE: re: Time to move along?, Eric van der Vlist
    - RE: re: Time to move along?, Eric van der Vlist
    - RE: re: Time to move along? - Make hard decisions cleanly., Jon Hanna
    - RE: re: Time to move along?, ldodds
    - Re: re: Time to move along?, Rael Dornfest
    - RE: re: Time to move along?, Dan Brickley
    - Re: re: Time to move along?, Chris Croome
    - RE: re: Time to move along?, Jon Hanna
    - RE: re: Time to move along?, Eric van der Vlist
    - Re: re: Time to move along?, Sean B. Palmer
    - Re: re: Time to move along?, Morten Frederiksen
    - RE: re: Time to move along?, ldodds
    - RE: re: Time to move along?, David Galbraith
    - Re: re: Time to move along?, Rael Dornfest
RSS bugzilla?, burton
- Re: RSS bugzilla?, Ben Hammersley
  - Re: RSS bugzilla?, ldodds
RSS Fork Practical advice?, Mike_McCracken_PSU
- Re: RSS Fork Practical advice?, burton
- Re: RSS Fork Practical advice?, Bill Kearney
- Re: RSS Fork Practical advice?, Bill Kearney
linkage cleanup ?, Bill Kearney
- Re: linkage cleanup ?, burton
Determing version of RSS-1.0, Bill Kearney
- Re: Determing version of RSS-1.0, Joseph Reagle
- RE: Determing version of RSS-1.0, Jon Hanna
  - Re: Determing version of RSS-1.0, Bill Kearney
    - RE: Determing version of RSS-1.0, Jon Hanna
    - Re: Determing version of RSS-1.0, Ben Hammersley
- Re: Determing version of RSS-1.0, Eric van der Vlist
  - Re: Determing version of RSS-1.0, burton
    - Re: Determing version of RSS-1.0, Morten Frederiksen
    - Re: Determing version of RSS-1.0, Eric van der Vlist
    - Re: Determing version of RSS-1.0, Morten Frederiksen
    - Re: Determing version of RSS-1.0, Eric van der Vlist
    - Re: Determing version of RSS-1.0, burton
    - RE: Determing version of RSS-1.0, Jon Hanna
    - Re: Determing version of RSS-1.0, Eric van der Vlist
element optional usage, Bill Kearney
- Dublin Core Use (was RE: element optional usage), Jon Hanna
- Re: element optional usage, burton
Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Leigh Dodds
- RE: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Jon Hanna
  - Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Joseph Reagle
    - Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Bill Kearney
    - Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Joseph Reagle
    - Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Joe Gregorio
    - RE: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Jon Hanna
    - Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Bill Kearney
    - Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Joe Gregorio
    - Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Morbus Iff
    - Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Bill Kearney
    - Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Morten Frederiksen
    - RE: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Jon Hanna
    - Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Joe Gregorio
    - Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Joe Gregorio
    - Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Bill Kearney
    - Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, p2psmoke
    - Re: Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Joe Gregorio
    - Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, p2psmoke
    - Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], Sean B. Palmer
    - Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], p2psmoke
    - Re: Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], Chris Croome
    - Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], p2psmoke
    - Re: Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], Dan Brickley
    - Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], p2psmoke
    - Re: Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], Dan Brickley
    - Re: Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], Chris Croome
    - Re: Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], Dan Brickley
    - Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], p2psmoke
    - Re: Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], Chris Croome
    - Re: Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], Dan Brickley
    - RE: Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], Ziv Caspi
    - RE: Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], Dan Brickley
    - Re: Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], Chris Croome
    - Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], p2psmoke
    - Re: Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], Bill Kearney
    - Re: Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], Eric van der Vlist
    - Re: Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], Bill Kearney
    - Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], Joe Gregorio
    - Re: Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, ldodds
    - Re: Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Libby Miller
    - Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Chris Croome
    - Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, p2psmoke
    - Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, p2psmoke
    - Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Bill Kearney
    - Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Bill Kearney
    - Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Bill Kearney
    - RE: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Leigh Dodds
    - Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Joseph Reagle
    - RE: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Leigh Dodds
    - Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Joseph Reagle
    - RE: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Leigh Dodds
    - Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Joseph Reagle
    - Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Joe Gregorio
    - RE: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Jon Hanna
    - Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Bill Kearney
    - RE: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Jon Hanna
    - Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Bill Kearney
    - RE: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Jon Hanna
    - Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Bill Kearney
  - Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Bill Kearney
- Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Ken MacLeod
  - Re: Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Joseph Reagle
  - Re: Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Bill Kearney
    - Re: Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Morten Frederiksen
- Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Ken MacLeod
RELAX NG Schema for RSS 1.0, Leigh Dodds
RSS-1.0 generator for Radio8, Bill Kearney
- Re: RSS-1.0 generator for Radio8, Simon Fell
- Re: RSS-1.0 generator for Radio8, Bill Kearney
- Re: RSS-1.0 generator for Radio8, Bill Kearney
- Re: RSS-1.0 generator for Radio8, Bill Kearney
myRSS, Ian Davis
RSS Size Statistics..., Jeff Barr
- Re: RSS Size Statistics..., Duncan Wilcox
- Re: RSS Size Statistics..., tappnel
  - Re: Re: RSS Size Statistics..., Bill Kearney
    - RE: Re: RSS Size Statistics..., Ziv Caspi
    - Re: Re: RSS Size Statistics..., Bill Kearney
    - RE: Re: RSS Size Statistics..., David Galbraith
    - Re: Re: RSS Size Statistics..., Bill Kearney
    - Re: Re: RSS Size Statistics..., Morten Frederiksen
    - Re: Re: RSS Size Statistics..., Ben Hammersley
    - Re: Re: RSS Size Statistics..., burton
    - Re: Re: RSS Size Statistics..., burton
    - RE: Re: RSS Size Statistics..., Ziv Caspi
    - Re: RSS Size Statistics..., tappnel
    - Re: Re: RSS Size Statistics..., Bill Kearney
    - Re: Re: RSS Size Statistics..., Bill Kearney
    - Re: Re: RSS Size Statistics..., Duncan Wilcox
    - RE: Re: RSS Size Statistics..., Jon Hanna
    - RE: Re: RSS Size Statistics..., Ziv Caspi
    - RE: Re: RSS Size Statistics..., Jon Hanna
    - Bad Habits, Leigh Dodds
    - Re: Bad Habits, Morbus Iff
    - RE: Bad Habits, Jon Hanna
    - Re: Bad Habits, tappnel
    - RE: Re: Bad Habits, Jon Hanna
  - Re: Re: RSS Size Statistics..., Morten Frederiksen
Re: Re: RSS events feeds, Libby Miller
- Re: Re: RSS events feeds, Scott Raymond
  - Re: Re: RSS events feeds, Libby Miller
    - Re: Re: Re: RSS events feeds, Chris Croome
- Re: RSS events feeds, kellan
[mod_link] spec updated, burton
- Re: [mod_link] spec updated, Ben Hammersley
Character Encodings., Jon Hanna
- Re: Character Encodings., Bill Kearney
  - Re: Character Encodings., Morten Frederiksen
    - Re: Character Encodings., Bill Kearney
    - Re: Character Encodings., Morten Frederiksen
    - RE: Character Encodings., Jon Hanna
    - Re: Character Encodings., mof-rss-dev
impls of richequiv, burton
Re: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., burton
- Re: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., Simon Fell
- Re: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., Bill Kearney
  - Re: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., Ian Graham
    - Re: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., Bill Kearney
    - Re: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., Ian Graham
    - Re: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., Chris Croome
  - Re: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., Simon Fell
- Re: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., Morten Frederiksen
  - Re: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., burton
    - Re: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., Morten Frederiksen
- Re: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., Chris Croome
  - Re: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., Bill Kearney
- RE: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., Ziv Caspi
  - Re: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., Simon Fell