network.syndication.rss.devel (date)

network.syndication.rss.devel (date)

September 30, 2002

Re: reminder tips for creating [1.0] modules, Ken MacLeod
Re: reminder tips for creating [1.0] modules, jdklub
RE: Re: [RSS2-Support] Re: Summary of issue with xmlns attribute, Jon Hanna
reminder tips for creating [1.0] modules, Ken MacLeod

September 29, 2002

Re: [RSS2-Support] Re: Summary of issue with xmlns attribute, Sam Ruby
RE: Re: [RSS2-Support] Re: Summary of issue with xmlns attribute, Danny Ayers
Re: [RSS2-Support] Re: Summary of issue with xmlns attribute, Sam Ruby
Re: Re: Speak of the devil, Bill Kearney

September 28, 2002

RE: mod_trackback, Danny Ayers
Re: Re: mod_trackback, James Linden
Re: mod_trackback, jdklub
Re: mod_trackback, James Linden
mod_trackback, jdklub
Re: Namespaces in RSS 2.0, Bill Kearney

September 27, 2002

Re: Namespaces in RSS 2.0, burton
Re: Namespaces in RSS 2.0, burton
Re: Namespaces in RSS 2.0, Sam Ruby
Re: Namespaces in RSS 2.0, Bill Kearney
Re: Namespaces in RSS 2.0, Ben Hammersley
Re: Namespaces in RSS 2.0, Seth Russell
Re: Namespaces in RSS 2.0, mof-rss-dev
Re: Speak of the devil, Joseph Reagle
RE: Re: Speak of the devil, Sam Ruby
Re: Namespaces in RSS 2.0, Ben Hammersley
RE: Re: Namespaces in RSS 2.0, Jon Hanna
Re: Namespaces in RSS 2.0, Andy Powell
Re: Namespaces in RSS 2.0, Shelley Powers
Re: Namespaces in RSS 2.0, Sam Ruby
RE: Re: Speak of the devil, Jon Hanna
RE: RSS in N3 (Redux), Jon Hanna
Namespaces in RSS 2.0, Dave Winer
OT: #rss on irc.openprojects.net, Paul Kelly
OT: Re: Speak of the devil, Bill Kearney
Re: Re: Speak of the devil, Dan Brickley
Re: Speak of the devil, Dave Winer
Re: Namespaces in RSS 2.0, Dan Brickley
Re: Speak of the devil, Shelley Powers
Namespaces in RSS 2.0, Sam Ruby
Re: Speak of the devil, Shelley Powers
Fw: Namespaces in RSS 2.0, Dave Winer
RSS in N3 (Redux), Morbus Iff
Re: Speak of the devil, Eric van der Vlist
Speak of the devil, Dave Winer
Namespaces in RSS 2.0, Dave Winer
Re: Elements at same level as <channel>, Eric Vitiello
RE: newbie question, Jon Hanna
RE: Namespace Extension in RSS 2.0, Jon Hanna
newbie question, Ismail KIRTILLI
Re: Elements at same level as <channel>, tappnel
[OT] My Motivations and AmphetaDesk's Future, Morbus Iff

September 26, 2002

Re: Elements at same level as <channel>, Ben Hammersley
Re: Move on, tappnel
Move on, Dave Winer
Re: Namespace Extension in RSS 2.0, Dave Winer
Re: RSS directory, jdklub
OT: Feel free to skip, jdklub
Elements at same level as <channel>, Dave Winer
Re: Responses to Sean Palmer's comments, Sean B. Palmer
Namespace Extension in RSS 2.0, Sean B. Palmer
OT: Re: Disclaimer, Bill Kearney
Re: Re: Disclaimer, Morbus Iff
Re: Responses to Sean Palmer's comments, tappnel
Re: Disclaimer, Bill Kearney
RSS directory, Dave Winer
Dan's special case, Dave Winer
Re: Responses to Sean Palmer's comments, Dan Brickley
Responses to Sean Palmer's comments, Dave Winer
Re: Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question), Dan Brickley
Re: Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question), mof-rss-dev
RDF calendar workshop, Bristol, UK, 2002-10-09, Libby Miller
RE: Semi-OT - Some Thoughts On Simplicity, Jon Hanna
Re: Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question), Libby Miller
Re: Re: Observation, Mike Krus
Re: mod_link and source info?, mof-rss-dev
Re: mod_link and source info?, mof-rss-dev
Re: Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question), mof-rss-dev
Re: Re: Observation, Phil Ringnalda
Re: Semi-OT - Some Thoughts On Simplicity, Phil Ringnalda
Re: Numbers, James Linden
Sean's comments, Dave Winer
Numbers, Dave Winer
Re: Disclaimer, Leandro Mariano Lopez
Re: MacOS X RSS users BOF next week, Rael Dornfest
RE: Disclaimer, pw-yahoogroups
Re: Disclaimer, Marcus Campbell
Re: Re: Observation, Ben Hammersley
Good joke Ben, Dave Winer
Disclaimer, Dave Winer
RE: OT - Observation, Eric Vitiello
Re: Observation, Ben Hammersley
Re: Observation, Dave Winer
Re: Observation, Marcus Campbell
Re: Transparency is essential, Bill Kearney
RE: OT - Observation, Jon Hanna
Re: Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question), Marcus Campbell
Re: Observation, Eric van der Vlist
Observation, Dave Winer
Transparency is essential, Dave Winer
Semi-OT - Some Thoughts On Simplicity, Jon Hanna
RE: [ann] Extending RSS 2.0 With Namespaces, Jon Hanna
Re: Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question), Ben Hammersley
Re: Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question), Phil Ringnalda
[updated] Extending RSS 2.0 With Namespaces, Morbus Iff
Re: [ann] Extending RSS 2.0 With Namespaces, dondppark
Re: Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question), dondppark
[ann] Extending RSS 2.0 With Namespaces, Morbus Iff
Re: Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question), Ben Hammersley
Re: Why is RSS 2.0 Bad?, Sean B. Palmer

September 25, 2002

Re: Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question), Ben Hammersley
Re: Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question), Morbus Iff
Re: Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question), Ben Hammersley
Re: Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question), Morbus Iff
Re: Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question), Ben Hammersley
Re: mod_link and source info?, burton
Re: mod_link and source info?, burton
RE: Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question), David Galbraith
Re: Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question), Morbus Iff
Re: Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question), Ben Hammersley
Re: Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question), Dan Brickley
Why is RSS 2.0 Bad? (Not a Rhetorical Question), Morbus Iff
Re: Is this valid?, Bill Kearney
Re: Cramming a world of RDF into RSS -- or not., Bill Kearney
RE: Is this valid?, Jon Hanna
Cramming a world of RDF into RSS -- or not., Ken MacLeod
Re: Is this valid?, Bill Kearney
Re: Is this valid?, Bill Kearney
RE: Is this valid?, Jon Hanna
Is this valid?, Bill Kearney
RE: Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Jon Hanna
Re: mod_link and source info?, Bill Kearney

September 24, 2002

rdf:about="" [was: Re: A year-zero strawman.], Bill Kearney
Re: rdf:about="" [was: Re: A year-zero strawman.], Lachlan Cannon
Re: rdf:about="" [was: Re: A year-zero strawman.], Chris Croome
Re: rdf:about="" [was: Re: A year-zero strawman.], Bill Kearney
Re: rdf:about="" [was: Re: A year-zero strawman.], Chris Croome
Re: mod_link and source info?, mof-rss-dev
Re: MacOS X RSS users BOF next week, burton

September 23, 2002

rdf:about="" [was: Re: A year-zero strawman.], Sean B. Palmer
Re: Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Dan Brickley
Re: Apologies, Morbus Iff
Apologies, Shelley Powers
Re: Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Seth Russell
Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Shelley Powers
Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Michael S. Manley
Re: Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Dan Brickley
Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Shelley Powers
RE: Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Ziv Caspi
Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Shelley Powers
Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Shelley Powers
RE: Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Bradley P. Allen
RE: Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Bradley P. Allen
RE: Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Danny Ayers
RE: Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Danny Ayers
Re: Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, DJ Adams
Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Shelley Powers
RE: Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Bradley P. Allen
Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Shelley Powers
Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Shelley Powers
Re: Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, DJ Adams
RE: Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Danny Ayers
Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Shelley Powers
RE: Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Bradley P. Allen
Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Shelley Powers
Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Shelley Powers
RE: Merge threads - who, what, why, Bradley P. Allen
Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Shelley Powers
Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, DJ Adams
Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Shelley Powers
Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Shelley Powers
Re: Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Seth Russell
Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Shelley Powers
Re: Merge threads - who, what, why, Bill Kearney
RE: Merge threads - who, what, why, Bradley P. Allen
RE: Merge threads - who, what, why, Danny Ayers
Merge threads - who, what, why, Shelley Powers
Re: MacOS X RSS users BOF next week, burton
Re: mod_link and source info?, burton

September 22, 2002

MacOS X RSS users BOF next week, Dan Brickley
Re: rdf an id attributes, burton

September 21, 2002

Re: mod_link and source info?, Bill Kearney
Re: mod_link and source info?, burton
mod_taxonomy vs dc:subject?, Bill Kearney
request: dcterms not listed in proposed modules?, Bill Kearney
Re: Who are we and what are we trying to accomplish anyway ?, Ian Graham
Re: Who are we and what are we trying to accomplish anyway ?, Seth Russell
Re: Who are we and what are we trying to accomplish anyway ?, Ian Graham
Re: Who are we and what are we trying to accomplish anyway ?, Ian Graham
Re: Who are we and what are we trying to accomplish anyway ?, Phil Ringnalda
Re: Who are we and what are we trying to accomplish anyway ?, Seth Russell
Re: Who are we and what are we trying to accomplish anyway ?, Ian Graham
RE: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Ian Graham
mod_link and source info?, Bill Kearney
Re: A year-zero strawman., Bill Kearney
RE: The Focus Discussion (was Re: Time for a name change?), Danny Ayers
Re: A year-zero strawman., Phil Ringnalda

September 20, 2002

Re: The Focus Discussion (was Re: Time for a name change?), Dan Brickley
tap namespace / RSS use case, Dan Brickley
Re: Re: Who are we and what are we trying to accomplish anyway ?, Eric van der Vlist
Re: Who are we and what are we trying to accomplish anyway ?, tappnel
Re: Who are we and what are we trying to accomplish anyway ?, Bill Kearney
Re: Who are we and what are we trying to accomplish anyway ?, tappnel
Re: Who are we and what are we trying to accomplish anyway ?, Joseph Reagle
Re: Who are we and what are we trying to accomplish anyway ?, Dan Brickley
Re: Who are we and what are we trying to accomplish anyway ?, Dan Brickley
Re: Who are we and what are we trying to accomplish anyway ?, Eric van der Vlist
Re: Re: Time for a name change?, Bill Kearney
Re: Who are we and what are we trying to accomplish anyway ?, Joseph Reagle
Re: Who are we and what are we trying to accomplish anyway ?, Dan Brickley
Re: Who are we and what are we trying to accomplish anyway ?, Dan Brickley
Re: Who are we and what are we trying to accomplish anyway ?, Joseph Reagle
Re: Time for a name change?, tappnel
Who are we and what are we trying to accomplish anyway ?, Seth Russell
The Focus Discussion (was Re: Time for a name change?), tappnel
Re: Time for a name change?, tappnel
RE: The Focus Discussion (was Re: Time for a name change?), Jon Hanna
Re: The Focus Discussion (was Re: Time for a name change?), Joseph Reagle
The Focus Discussion (was Re: Time for a name change?), Ben Hammersley
RE: Re: Time for a name change?, Jon Hanna
Re: Re: Time for a name change?, Bill Kearney
Re: Time for a name change?, tappnel
Re: Time for a name change?, tappnel
RE: Re: Time for a name change?, Danny Ayers
Re: Re: Time for a name change?, Bill Kearney
Re: Re: Time for a name change?, Bill Kearney
RE: Re: Time for a name change?, Jon Hanna
RE: A year-zero strawman., Peter Wilkinson
Re: Time for a name change?, Shelley Powers
RE: Re: Time for a name change?, Danny Ayers
Re: Time for a name change?, Shelley Powers
Re: Re: Time for a name change?, Bill Kearney
Re: Re: Time for a name change?, Dan Brickley
Re: Re: Time for a name change?, Dan Brickley
Re: Time for a name change?, Shelley Powers
Re: Re: Time for a name change?, Ben Hammersley
Re: Re: Time for a name change?, Bill Kearney
Re: Fwd: Re: RelaxNG Schema for RSS 1.0 Core, Joseph Reagle
Re: Re: Time for a name change?, Seth Russell
Re: Re: Time for a name change?, Dan Brickley
Re: Fwd: Re: RelaxNG Schema for RSS 1.0 Core, Bill Kearney
Fwd: Re: RelaxNG Schema for RSS 1.0 Core, Joseph Reagle
RE: Re: A year-zero strawman., Jon Hanna
RE: A year-zero strawman., Jon Hanna
RE: Re: A year-zero strawman., Danny Ayers
Re: Time for a name change?, Joe Gregorio
Re: A year-zero strawman., Bill Kearney
Re: A year-zero strawman., Joe Gregorio
RE: A year-zero strawman., Jon Hanna
RE: Re: Guilt by association?, Jon Hanna
RE: Re: A year-zero strawman., Jon Hanna
Re: A year-zero strawman., mof-rss-dev
RE: A year-zero strawman., Peter Wilkinson

September 19, 2002

Re: Guilt by association?, Bill Kearney
Re: A year-zero strawman., tappnel
RE: Re: A year-zero strawman., Danny Ayers
Re: A year-zero strawman., tappnel
RE: A year-zero strawman., Jon Hanna
Re: A year-zero strawman., Morten Frederiksen
RE: A year-zero strawman., Jon Hanna
RE: A year-zero strawman., Danny Ayers
Re: A year-zero strawman., Dan Brickley
Re: A year-zero strawman., Bill Kearney
Re: A year-zero strawman., Ben Hammersley
RE: A year-zero strawman., pw-yahoogroups
RE: A year-zero strawman., Jon Hanna
RE: rdf an id attributes, Jon Hanna
RE: A year-zero strawman., Jon Hanna
Re: A year-zero strawman., DJ Adams
Re: rdf an id attributes, Dave Beckett
Re: A year-zero strawman., Dan Brickley
rdf an id attributes, Bill Kearney
RE: A year-zero strawman., Dan Brickley
RE: A year-zero strawman., Jon Hanna
RE: A year-zero strawman., Jon Hanna
Re: A year-zero strawman., Ben Hammersley
Re: A year-zero strawman., Bill Kearney
Re: Re: Time for a name change?, Bill Kearney
Re: A year-zero strawman., Chris Croome
RE: Apology, Danny Ayers
Re: A year-zero strawman., mof-rss-dev
Re: A year-zero strawman., Joe Gregorio
Re: Time for a name change?, tappnel
The Problem with rdf:Seq [was: Re: Time for a name change?], Joe Gregorio
RE: Apology, Jon Hanna
Apology, funzelkick
sorry but i need help!, nisrine_tazi
RE: Re: Time for a name change?, Jon Hanna
A year-zero strawman., Jon Hanna
Re: Re: Time for a name change?, Bill Kearney
RE: Re: Time for a name change?, Eric Vitiello Jr.
RE: Re: Time for a name change?, Jon Hanna
Re: Re: Time for a name change?, James Linden
RE: Re: Time for a name change?, Danny Ayers
RE: The Problem with rdf:Seq [was: Re: Time for a name change?], Jon Hanna
RE: Re: Time for a name change?, Jon Hanna
Re: The Problem with rdf:Seq [was: Re: Time for a name change?], Dave Beckett
The Problem with rdf:Seq [was: Re: Time for a name change?], Sjoerd Visscher
Re: Re: Guilt by association?, Ian Davis
Re: Guilt by association?, funzelkick

September 18, 2002

RE: The Problem with rdf:Seq [was: Re: Time for a name change?], Danny Ayers
RelaxNG Schema for RSS 1.0 Core, Joseph Reagle
Re: The Problem with rdf:Seq [was: Re: Time for a name change?], Dave Beckett
RE: The Problem with rdf:Seq [was: Re: Time for a name change?], Danny Ayers
RE: Re: Time for a name change?, Ziv Caspi
RE: Re: Time for a name change?, Danny Ayers
The Problem with rdf:Seq [was: Re: Time for a name change?], Sean B. Palmer
RE: Re: Time for a name change?, Danny Ayers
Re: Re: Time for a name change?, Joseph Reagle
RE: Re: Time for a name change?, Peter Wilkinson
RE: Re: Time for a name change?, Jon Hanna
Re: Time for a name change?, Bill Kearney
Re: Time for a name change?, kellan
Re: Re: Time for a name change?, Ben Hammersley
RE: Re: Time for a name change?, Jon Hanna
RE: Re: Time for a name change?, Eric Vitiello Jr.
Re: Re: Time for a name change?, Joseph Reagle
RE: Re: Time for a name change?, Jon Hanna
Re: Time for a name change?, Joe Gregorio
RE: Re: Time for a name change?, Jon Hanna
RE: Re: Time for a name change?, Danny Ayers
Re: Time for a name change?, Bill Kearney
RE: Time for a name change?, Jon Hanna
Re: Time for a name change?, Eric Vitiello Jr.
Re: Re: Time for a name change?, Joseph Reagle
Re: Time for a name change?, Bill Kearney
Re: Time for a name change?, e_vitiello_jr
Re: Time for a name change?, Bill Kearney
RE: General SYN (was RE: Time for a name change?), Jon Hanna
General SYN (was RE: Time for a name change?), Danny Ayers
Re: Time for a name change?, Eric van der Vlist
Re: Time for a name change?, burton
Re: Re: Guilt by association?, Jeff Barr
RSS 1.0 for scripting.com, burton
Re: Guilt by association?, jdklub

September 17, 2002

Re: Time for a name change?, Ben Hammersley
RE: Time for a name change?, David Galbraith
Re: Time for a name change?, Dan Brickley
Re: Time for a name change?, James Linden
Re: Time for a name change?, Bill Kearney
Re: Time for a name change?, Joseph Reagle
Re: Time for a name change?, Morten Frederiksen
Re: Time for a name change?, Morten Frederiksen
publish and subscribe, Ben Hammersley
RE: Time for a name change?, Ziv Caspi
Re: Time for a name change?, Ben Hammersley
RE: Time for a name change?, Danny Ayers
Re: Time for a name change?, Ben Hammersley
Re: Time for a name change?, Joseph Reagle
Re: Time for a name change?, Bill Kearney
Re: Time for a name change?, Ben Hammersley
Re: Time for a name change?, Michael S. Manley
Re: Time for a name change?, Eric van der Vlist
Re: Time for a name change?, Bill Kearney
Re: Time for a name change?, James Linden
Re: Time for a name change?, Sean B. Palmer
Time for a name change?, Bill Kearney
Guilt by association?, Bill Kearney
blog comments feed, Ben Hammersley
relating rss namespace(s) to other vocabulary, Dan Brickley

September 16, 2002

RE: RSS 2.0: Restriction on Whitespace in <link>|<url>, Morbus Iff
Shelley on RDF, Bill Kearney
Re: RSS MIME type - application/rss+xml was: [Re: Which syndication format should I use?], burton

September 15, 2002

RE: RSS 2.0: Restriction on Whitespace in <link>|<url>, Danny Ayers
RSS 2.0: Restriction on Whitespace in <link>|<url>, Morbus Iff
Re: RSS MIME type - application/rss+xml was: [Re: Which syndication format should I use?], Mark Nottingham

September 14, 2002

RE: Bugzilla and Wiki, Dan Brickley
Re: RSS 2.0: "Subsequent Works", Morbus Iff
Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, kelliottmccrea
Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, kelliottmccrea
Re: RSS 2.0: "Subsequent Works", Seth Russell
RSS 2.0: "Subsequent Works", Morbus Iff
RE: Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, Danny Ayers
Re: New members ahoy!, burton

September 13, 2002

RE: Bugzilla and Wiki, David LeBlanc
Re: Bugzilla and Wiki, Ian Graham
Re: Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, burton
Re: Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, Bill Kearney
RE: Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, Jon Hanna
Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, kelliottmccrea
Re: schemas for modules?, Eric van der Vlist
Re: schemas for modules?, Bill Kearney
Re: schemas for modules?, Bill Kearney
Re: schemas for modules?, Bill Kearney
Re: Bugzilla and Wiki, Aaron Swartz
RE: schemas for modules?, Jon Hanna
RE: schemas for modules?, Eric van der Vlist
Tutorial on buiding an aggregator with Python, Leandro Mariano Lopez
RE: schemas for modules?, Jon Hanna
RE: schemas for modules?, Eric van der Vlist
Re: RSS MIME type - application/rss+xml was: [Re: Which syndication format should I use?], Chris Croome
RE: schemas for modules?, Jon Hanna
Re: schemas for modules?, Eric van der Vlist
Re: schemas for modules?, Bill Kearney
RE: schemas for modules?, Eric van der Vlist
RE: schemas for modules?, Jon Hanna
RE: schemas for modules?, Eric van der Vlist
RE: schemas for modules?, Jon Hanna
Re: schemas for modules?, Bill Kearney
RE: RSS MIME type - application/rss+xml was: [Re: Which syndication format should I use?], Jon Hanna
RE: schemas for modules?, Eric van der Vlist
RE: schemas for modules?, Jon Hanna
Re: New members ahoy!, Libby Miller
New members ahoy!, Ben Hammersley
Re: Bugzilla and Wiki, Eric van der Vlist
Re: RSS MIME type - application/rss+xml was: [Re: Which syndication format should I use?], burton
Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, burton
Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, burton
Re: Bugzilla and Wiki, Dan Brickley
Re: Bugzilla and Wiki, burton

September 12, 2002

Re: schemas for modules?, Bill Kearney
Re: schemas for modules?, Dan Brickley
Re: schemas for modules?, Libby Miller
Re: schemas for modules?, Bill Kearney
Re: schemas for modules?, Eric van der Vlist
Re: schemas for modules?, Bill Kearney
Re: module docs need fixing, Chris Croome
Bugzilla and Wiki, ldodds
module docs need fixing, Bill Kearney
Re: Re: New poll for rss-dev, Morten Frederiksen
version missing in mod link and sub, Bill Kearney
Re: schemas for modules?, Eric van der Vlist
schemas for modules?, Bill Kearney
RE: Re: New poll for rss-dev, Jon Hanna
Re: Re: New poll for rss-dev, Morten Frederiksen
RE: Re: New poll for rss-dev, Jon Hanna
Re: Re: New poll for rss-dev, Bill Kearney
RE: Re: New poll for rss-dev, Jon Hanna
Nice article by DJ Adams, Leigh Dodds
Re: Use cases, Morten Frederiksen
Re: New poll for rss-dev, Ken MacLeod
Re: Re: New poll for rss-dev, Dan Brickley
RE: Re: New poll for rss-dev, Jon Hanna
Re: New poll for rss-dev, Ken MacLeod
RE: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, Jon Hanna
RE: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, Danny Ayers
Re: Multiple occurences, Morten Frederiksen
Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Ian Graham
Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, burton
Re: Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, burton

September 11, 2002

RE: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, Danny Ayers
RE: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, Danny Ayers
Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, Sjoerd Visscher
Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, burton
Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, burton
Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, Eric van der Vlist
Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, Bill Kearney
Re: New poll for rss-dev, Bill Kearney
Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, burton
Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, burton
Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, burton
Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, Eric van der Vlist
Re: How should I represent multiple subjects in my RSS1.0 feed?, Bill Kearney
Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, burton
Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, burton
Re: New poll for rss-dev, Chris Croome
Re: New poll for rss-dev, Bill Kearney
RE: value add (was RE: New poll for rss-dev), Jon Hanna
value add (was RE: New poll for rss-dev), Danny Ayers
Re: RSS MIME type - application/rss+xml was: [Re: Which syndication format should I use?], Ben Hammersley
RE: RSS MIME type - application/rss+xml was: [Re: Which syndication format should I use?], Jon Hanna
RE: Procedures (was: New poll for rss-dev), Jon Hanna
Poll results for rss-dev, rss-dev-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw
Procedures (was: New poll for rss-dev), Eric van der Vlist
RE: Re: New poll for rss-dev, Leigh Dodds
Re: How should I represent multiple subjects in my RSS1.0 feed?, Phil Ringnalda
Re: New poll for rss-dev, Ken MacLeod
RE: Re: New poll for rss-dev, Jon Hanna
RE: New poll for rss-dev, Jon Hanna
Re: busted purl, Chris Croome
Re: New poll for rss-dev, Chris Croome
Re: New poll for rss-dev, Bill Kearney
Re: Splitting the lists?, Morten Frederiksen
busted purl, Bill Kearney
Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, Morten Frederiksen
Re: New poll for rss-dev, Ken MacLeod
Re: Summarizing restructuring Purls to reflect version number, Morten Frederiksen
Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Joseph Reagle
Re: New poll for rss-dev, Chris Croome
purl refinements?, Bill Kearney
Re: Splitting the lists?, Eric van der Vlist
Splitting the lists?, Bill Kearney
RE: New poll for rss-dev, Jon Hanna
Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, Bill Kearney
Re: New poll for rss-dev, Bill Kearney
Re: New poll for rss-dev, Eric van der Vlist
Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
Summarizing restructuring Purls to reflect version number, Bill Kearney
Re: New poll for rss-dev, Chris Croome
Re: New poll for rss-dev, Chris Croome
Re: New poll for rss-dev, Eric van der Vlist
RE: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, Eric van der Vlist
Re: New poll for rss-dev, Bill Kearney
RE: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, Jon Hanna
Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Ian Graham
RE: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, Danny Ayers
New poll for rss-dev, rss-dev-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw
Re: How should I represent multiple subjects in my RSS1.0 feed?, Chris Croome
Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, Bill Kearney
How should I represent multiple subjects in my RSS1.0 feed?, Simon Willison
RE: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Libby Miller
Re: [LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, Eric van der Vlist
[LONG/PROPOSAL] UUID/GUIDs Within RSS and RDF, burton
Re: Which syndication format should I use?, Simon Willison

September 10, 2002

Re: RSS MIME type - application/rss+xml was: [Re: Which syndication format should I use?], Mark Nottingham
RSS 0.94/2.0 to RDF converter, Sjoerd Visscher
Re: RSS MIME type - application/rss+xml was: [Re: Which syndication format should I use?], Ben Hammersley
Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Joseph Reagle
RSS MIME type - application/rss+xml was: [Re: Which syndication format should I use?], Chris Croome
Re: Which syndication format should I use?, Bill Kearney
Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
Re: Which syndication format should I use?, Bill Kearney
Re: Which syndication format should I use?, Chris Croome
Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
Which syndication format should I use?, Simon Willison
Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Eric van der Vlist
Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Chris Croome
Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, ldodds
RE: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Jon Hanna
Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Joseph Reagle
fyi) recent rdf working draft, Bill Kearney
Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
RE: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Jon Hanna
Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Joseph Reagle
Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Joseph Reagle
Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
RE: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Jon Hanna
RE: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Jon Hanna
RE: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Andy Powell
Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
RE: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Leigh Dodds
RE: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Leigh Dodds
Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Eric van der Vlist
Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
RE: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Leigh Dodds
Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
RE: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Leigh Dodds
RE: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Jon Hanna
Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Eric van der Vlist
RE: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Jon Hanna
Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Joseph Reagle
RE: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Eric van der Vlist
RE: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Jon Hanna
RE: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Eric van der Vlist
RE: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Jon Hanna
RE: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Leigh Dodds
RE: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Jon Hanna
Re: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
RE: namespace idea?, Dan Brickley
Re: Dave Winer's RSS 2.0, Dan Brickley
RE: restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Jon Hanna
RE: namespace idea?, Leigh Dodds
restructuring Purls to reflect version number?, Bill Kearney
Re: Dave Winer's RSS 2.0, Ben Hammersley
RE: Dave Winer's RSS 2.0, Jon Hanna
Re: Dave Winer's RSS 2.0, Libby Miller
Re: Dave Winer's RSS 2.0, Eric van der Vlist
Re: Dave Winer's RSS 2.0, Joe Gregorio

September 09, 2002

Re: DW's RSS 2.0 is (possibly) RDF Compatible, Sean B. Palmer
RE: DW's RSS 2.0 is (possibly) RDF Compatible [was: Dave Winer's RSS 2.0], Jon Hanna
DW's RSS 2.0 is (possibly) RDF Compatible [was: Dave Winer's RSS 2.0], Sean B. Palmer
Re: Dave Winer's RSS 2.0, Eric van der Vlist
Re: [syndication] Dave Winer's RSS 2.0, Morbus Iff
Dave Winer's RSS 2.0, Chris Croome
Re: Order (was Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal), Bill Kearney
RE: re: Time to move along? - Make hard decisions cleanly., Jon Hanna
Order (was Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal), Eric van der Vlist
namespace idea?, Bill Kearney
Re: Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], Bill Kearney
Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], Ben Hammersley

September 08, 2002

Re: Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], Bill Kearney
Re: A note on namespaces, Ian Graham
CSS PURL [Was: Re: Suggestions for the future...], Chris Croome
Re: Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], Eric van der Vlist
Break out into multiple mailing lists?, burton
Re: Suggestions for the future..., burton
Re: Why not separate the RSS part form the RDF part?, burton
Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], Joe Gregorio

September 07, 2002

RE: Why not separate the RSS part form the RDF part?, Danny Ayers
Re: Multi-namespace architecture, cost etc (was re: Time to move along?), Bill Kearney
Re: Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], Bill Kearney
A note on namespaces, Dan Brickley
Re: Why not separate the RSS part form the RDF part?, Seth Russell
Re: Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], Dan Brickley
RE: Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], Dan Brickley
Re: Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], Chris Croome
RE: Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], Ziv Caspi
Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], p2psmoke
Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], p2psmoke
Re: Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], Dan Brickley
Re: Why not separate the RSS part form the RDF part?, Dan Brickley
Re: Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], Chris Croome
Re: Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], Chris Croome
Re: Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], Dan Brickley
Why not separate the RSS part form the RDF part?, Seth Russell
Multi-namespace architecture, cost etc (was re: Time to move along?), Dan Brickley
Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], p2psmoke
Re: RSS and WAP/WML... lessons re HTML and RDF and format divergence?, p2psmoke
Re: Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Libby Miller
Re: Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], Dan Brickley
process: please include poster attributions when quoting mail, Dan Brickley
RSS and WAP/WML... lessons re HTML and RDF and format divergence?, Dan Brickley
Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], p2psmoke
Re: Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], Chris Croome
Re: Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], p2psmoke
Re: Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, ldodds
Very Simple RSS 2.0 Proposal [was: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0], Sean B. Palmer
Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Ken MacLeod
Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, p2psmoke
Re: Extracting email from Yahoo groups [Was: Re: rss-dev old msgs], Libby Miller
Extracting email from Yahoo groups [Was: Re: rss-dev old msgs], Chris Croome
rss-dev old msgs, Libby Miller
Re: wrap-up, ldodds
RE: re: Time to move along?, Eric van der Vlist
RE: re: Time to move along?, Eric van der Vlist
RE: re: Time to move along?, Eric van der Vlist
wrap-up, Eric van der Vlist
Re: re: Time to move along?, Eric van der Vlist
Re: re: Time to move along?, Eric van der Vlist
Re: Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Joe Gregorio

September 06, 2002

[BLOG/LONG] The End of RSS Innocence, burton
Re: Time to move along?, p2psmoke
Re: re: Time to move along?, Rael Dornfest
RE: re: Time to move along?, Ziv Caspi
Re: re: Time to move along?, Rael Dornfest
Re: re: Time to move along?, Rael Dornfest
Re: re: Time to move along?, Rael Dornfest
Re: re: Time to move along?, Rael Dornfest
need opml file help, Paul Baker
Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, p2psmoke
Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, p2psmoke
Re: Suggestions for the future..., Bill Kearney
Re: Suggestions for the future..., burton
Re: Suggestions for the future..., Morten Frederiksen
Re: re: Time to move along?, Chris Croome
RE: re: Time to move along?, Eric van der Vlist
RE: re: Time to move along?, David Galbraith
Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Chris Croome
Re: re: Time to move along?, Bill Kearney
Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, p2psmoke
RE: re: Time to move along?, ldodds
Re: discussion on dcterms date usage?, Morten Frederiksen
RE: re: Time to move along?, ldodds
RE: re: Time to move along?, David Galbraith
Re: re: Time to move along?, ldodds
Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Bill Kearney
Re: re: Time to move along?, Morten Frederiksen
Re: re: Time to move along?, Sean B. Palmer
RE: re: Time to move along?, ldodds
Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Joe Gregorio
DCMI Period Encoding [Was: Re: discussion on dcterms date usage?], Chris Croome
Re: discussion on dcterms date usage?, Bill Kearney
RE: re: Time to move along?, Eric van der Vlist
Re: Suggestions for the future..., Bill Kearney
Re: discussion on dcterms date usage?, Bill Kearney
Re: re: Time to move along?, Bill Kearney
RE: re: Time to move along?, Jon Hanna
Re: re: Time to move along?, Chris Croome
Re: re: Time to move along?, Joe Gregorio
RE: re: Time to move along?, Dan Brickley
RE: re: Time to move along?, Jon Hanna
RE: re: Time to move along?, David Galbraith
RE: re: Time to move along?, Jon Hanna
RE: re: Time to move along?, Eric van der Vlist
Re: Suggestions for the future..., Chris Croome
RE: re: Time to move along?, Leigh Dodds
RE: Suggestions for the future..., Jon Hanna
Re: Suggestions for the future..., Eric van der Vlist
Re: legit way to express rdf?, Chris Croome
RE: Suggestions for the future..., Jon Hanna
RE: legit way to express rdf?, Jon Hanna
RE: re: Time to move along?, Eric van der Vlist
Re: Suggestions for the future..., Joe Gregorio
RE: re: Time to move along?, Jon Hanna
Re: discussion on dcterms date usage?, Morten Frederiksen
legit way to express rdf?, Bill Kearney
Suggestions for the future..., Morten Frederiksen
Re: re: Time to move along?, Bill Kearney
Re: discussion on dcterms date usage?, Bill Kearney
RE: re: Time to move along?, Jon Hanna
Re: re: Time to move along?, Eric van der Vlist
W3C xml namespaces last call, Bill Kearney
Re: Convergence at last!, Bill Kearney
Convergence at last!, Jon Hanna
Article from IEEE Spectrum on Semantic Web, Jon Hanna
Re: re: Time to move along?, Ian Davis
RE: Determing version of RSS-1.0, Jon Hanna
Re: Determing version of RSS-1.0, burton
Re: richer content without mod_content?, burton
RE: discussion on dcterms date usage?, Jon Hanna
RE: richer content without mod_content?, Jon Hanna
Re: discussion on dcterms date usage?, Chris Croome
Re: discussion on dcterms date usage?, Bill Kearney
Re: richer content without mod_content?, Bill Kearney
RE: discussion on dcterms date usage?, Jon Hanna
RE: richer content without mod_content?, Jon Hanna
RE: re: Time to move along?, Leigh Dodds
All PURLs should point to web.resource.org, burton
Re: discussion on dcterms date usage?, Morten Frederiksen
re: Time to move along?, Rael Dornfest
Re: RSS-1.0 generator for Radio8, Bill Kearney
Re: RSS-1.0 generator for Radio8, Bill Kearney
Re: RSS-1.0 generator for Radio8, Bill Kearney
Re: RSS-1.0 generator for Radio8, Simon Fell
richer content without mod_content?, Bill Kearney

September 05, 2002

Re: RSS Fork Practical advice?, Bill Kearney
discussion on dcterms date usage?, Bill Kearney
RE: Time to move along?, Ziv Caspi
Re: expressing dates effectively in RSS-1.0?, Bill Kearney
RE: expressing dates effectively in RSS-1.0?, Jon Hanna
expressing dates effectively in RSS-1.0?, Bill Kearney
Re: Practical advice about generating RSS, Bill Kearney
The mission of RSS., tappnel
RE: Time to move along?, Jon Hanna
Re: Time to move along?, Bill Kearney
RE: Time to move along?, Eric van der Vlist
Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Joe Gregorio
RE: Time to move along?, Jon Hanna
Re: Time to move along?, Joe Gregorio
Re: Practical advice about generating RSS, Bill Kearney
RE: Time to move along?, Eric van der Vlist
RE: Time to move along?, Jon Hanna
Re: Time to move along?, Bill Kearney
Re: Time to move along?, Bill Kearney
RE: Time to move along?, Jon Hanna
RE: Time to move along?, Jon Hanna
RE: Time to move along?, Eric van der Vlist
RE: Time to move along?, ldodds
RE: Time to move along?, Eric van der Vlist
RE: Time to move along?, ldodds
RE: Time to move along?, Jon Hanna
RE: Time to move along?, Eric van der Vlist
Re: RSS bugzilla?, ldodds
RE: Time to move along?, Jon Hanna
Re: RSS bugzilla?, Ben Hammersley
Re: Practical advice about generating RSS, Mike_McCracken_PSU
Re: Practical advice about generating RSS, Mike_McCracken_PSU
Practical advice about generating RSS, Mike_McCracken_PSU
Re: Determing version of RSS-1.0, Eric van der Vlist
Re: Determing version of RSS-1.0, Morten Frederiksen
Time to move along?, Eric van der Vlist
Re: Determing version of RSS-1.0, Eric van der Vlist
Re: Determing version of RSS-1.0, Eric van der Vlist
Re: Determing version of RSS-1.0, Morten Frederiksen
Re: RSS Fork Practical advice?, Bill Kearney
Re: element optional usage, burton
RSS bugzilla?, burton
Re: Determing version of RSS-1.0, burton
Re: RSS Fork Practical advice?, burton
RSS Fork Practical advice?, Mike_McCracken_PSU

September 04, 2002

Re: linkage cleanup ?, burton
linkage cleanup ?, Bill Kearney
Re: Re: RSS Size Statistics..., Morten Frederiksen
Re: Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Morten Frederiksen
Re: Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Bill Kearney
Re: Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Joseph Reagle
Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Joseph Reagle
Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Ken MacLeod
Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Joe Gregorio
Re: Re: Re: RSS events feeds, Chris Croome
Re: Determing version of RSS-1.0, Ben Hammersley
Re: Re: RSS events feeds, Libby Miller
RE: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Jon Hanna
RE: Determing version of RSS-1.0, Jon Hanna
Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Bill Kearney
Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Bill Kearney
Re: Determing version of RSS-1.0, Bill Kearney
RE: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Jon Hanna
Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Bill Kearney
RE: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Leigh Dodds
Re: Determing version of RSS-1.0, Eric van der Vlist
RE: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Jon Hanna
Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Bill Kearney
RE: Determing version of RSS-1.0, Jon Hanna
Re: Determing version of RSS-1.0, Joseph Reagle
Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Joseph Reagle
Determing version of RSS-1.0, Bill Kearney
RE: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Leigh Dodds
RE: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Jon Hanna
Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Morbus Iff
Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Joe Gregorio
Dublin Core Use (was RE: element optional usage), Jon Hanna
Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Morten Frederiksen
RE: Re: Bad Habits, Jon Hanna
Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Joseph Reagle
element optional usage, Bill Kearney
RE: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Leigh Dodds
Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Bill Kearney
Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Bill Kearney
Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Bill Kearney
Re: Bad Habits, tappnel
Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Bill Kearney
RE: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Jon Hanna
Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Joe Gregorio
Re: Re: RSS Size Statistics..., Bill Kearney
Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Bill Kearney
Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Joseph Reagle
Re: Re: RSS Size Statistics..., Bill Kearney
Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Bill Kearney
Re: RSS Size Statistics..., tappnel
Re: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Joseph Reagle
RE: Bad Habits, Jon Hanna
Re: Bad Habits, Morbus Iff
Bad Habits, Leigh Dodds
RE: Re: RSS Size Statistics..., Jon Hanna
RE: Re: RSS Size Statistics..., Ziv Caspi
RE: Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Jon Hanna
Two "beefs" with RSS 1.0, Leigh Dodds
RELAX NG Schema for RSS 1.0, Leigh Dodds
RE: Re: RSS Size Statistics..., Jon Hanna
RE: Re: RSS Size Statistics..., Ziv Caspi
Re: RSS events feeds, kellan
Re: Re: RSS Size Statistics..., Duncan Wilcox
Re: Re: RSS Size Statistics..., burton
Re: Re: RSS Size Statistics..., burton

September 03, 2002

Re: Re: RSS Size Statistics..., Ben Hammersley
Re: Re: RSS Size Statistics..., Morten Frederiksen
Re: Re: RSS Size Statistics..., Bill Kearney
RSS-1.0 generator for Radio8, Bill Kearney
RE: Re: RSS Size Statistics..., David Galbraith
Re: Re: RSS Size Statistics..., Bill Kearney
RE: Re: RSS Size Statistics..., Ziv Caspi
Re: Re: RSS Size Statistics..., Bill Kearney
Re: Re: RSS events feeds, Scott Raymond
Re: RSS Size Statistics..., tappnel
myRSS, Ian Davis
Re: RSS Size Statistics..., Duncan Wilcox

September 02, 2002

RSS Size Statistics..., Jeff Barr
Re: Re: RSS events feeds, Libby Miller
Re: [mod_link] spec updated, Ben Hammersley
Re: Character Encodings., mof-rss-dev
RE: Character Encodings., Jon Hanna
Re: Character Encodings., Morten Frederiksen
[mod_link] spec updated, burton

September 01, 2002

Re: Character Encodings., Bill Kearney
Re: Character Encodings., Morten Frederiksen
Re: Character Encodings., Bill Kearney
Character Encodings., Jon Hanna
Re: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., Simon Fell
RE: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., Ziv Caspi
Re: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., Chris Croome
Re: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., Simon Fell
Re: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., Ian Graham
Re: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., Bill Kearney
Re: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., Ian Graham
Re: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., Bill Kearney
Re: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., Bill Kearney
Re: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., Chris Croome
Re: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., Morten Frederiksen
Re: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., burton
impls of richequiv, burton
Re: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., Morten Frederiksen
Re: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., Simon Fell
Re: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., burton

News | FAQ | advertise