|
|
Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., Jon Hanna
- Re: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., Bill Kearney
- Re: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., Bill Kearney
- RE: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., Jon Hanna
- Re: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., Bill Kearney
- RE: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., Jon Hanna
- Re: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., Bill Kearney
- RE: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., Jon Hanna
- RE: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., Ziv Caspi
- RE: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., Jon Hanna
- Re: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., Bill Kearney
- RE: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., Jon Hanna
- Re: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., Bill Kearney
- RE: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., Jon Hanna
- Re: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., burton
- Re: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., burton
- Re: Proposed module: Rich Equivalents., burton
Right, let's have a look at RDFS, Ben Hammersley
- Re: Right, let's have a look at RDFS, Morten Frederiksen
- Re: Right, let's have a look at RDFS, Ben Hammersley
- RE: Right, let's have a look at RDFS, Jon Hanna
- Re: Right, let's have a look at RDFS, Ben Hammersley
- Re: Right, let's have a look at RDFS, Aaron Swartz
- Re: Right, let's have a look at RDFS, Ben Hammersley
- RE: Right, let's have a look at RDFS, Jon Hanna
- Re: Right, let's have a look at RDFS, Bill Kearney
- Re: Right, let's have a look at RDFS, Seth Russell
Request For Comments: RMDSR 0.1, Ben Hammersley
- Re: Request For Comments: RMDSR 0.1, Morbus Iff
- RE: Request For Comments: RMDSR 0.1, Jon Hanna
- RE: Request For Comments: RMDSR 0.1, Morbus Iff
- Re: Request For Comments: RMDSR 0.1, bhammersley_uk
- Re: Request For Comments: RMDSR 0.1, bhammersley_uk
- Re: Re: Request For Comments: RMDSR 0.1, Aaron Swartz
- Re: Re: Request For Comments: RMDSR 0.1, Aaron Swartz
- Re: Re: Request For Comments: RMDSR 0.1, burton
- Re: Request For Comments: RMDSR 0.1, bhammersley_uk
- RE: Re: Request For Comments: RMDSR 0.1, Jon Hanna
- Re: Re: Request For Comments: RMDSR 0.1, Ben Hammersley
- Re: Re: Request For Comments: RMDSR 0.1, Ben Hammersley
- Re: Re: Request For Comments: RMDSR 0.1, Seth Russell
- RE: Re: Request For Comments: RMDSR 0.1, Jon Hanna
- Re: Re: Request For Comments: RMDSR 0.1, Seth Russell
- RE: Re: Request For Comments: RMDSR 0.1, Jon Hanna
- Re: Re: Request For Comments: RMDSR 0.1, Seth Russell
- Re: Re: Request For Comments: RMDSR 0.1, Bill Kearney
Process: Extending the WG, Rael Dornfest
- Re: Process: Extending the WG, Eric Miller
- Re: Process: Extending the WG, burton
- Re: Process: Extending the WG, Dan Brickley
- Re: Process: Extending the WG, Rael Dornfest
- Re: Process: Extending the WG, Dan Brickley
- Re: Process: Extending the WG, Bill Kearney
- Re: Process: Extending the WG, Dan Brickley
- Re: Process: Extending the WG, Bill Kearney
- Re: Process: Extending the WG, burton
- Re: Process: Extending the WG, Dan Brickley
- mod_threading and representing email lists [Was: Re: Process: Extending the WG], Chris Croome
- Re: mod_threading and representing email lists [Was: Re: Process: Extending the WG], Chris Croome
- Re: mod_threading and representing email lists [Was: Re: Process: Extending the WG], burton
- Relationship between <title> <dc:title> and <dcterms:alternative>, Chris Croome
- RE: Relationship between <title> <dc:title> and <dcterms:alternative>, Jon Hanna
- Re: Relationship between <title> <dc:title> and <dcterms:alternative>, Chris Croome
- RE: Relationship between <title> <dc:title> and <dcterms:alternative>, Jon Hanna
- Re: Relationship between <title> <dc:title> and <dcterms:alternative>, Bill Kearney
- <script>alert('b0rk')</script> (was: Relationship between <title> <dc:title> and <dcterms:alternative>), Jon Hanna
- Re: <script>alert('b0rk')</script> (was: Relationship between <title> <dc:title> and <dcterms:alternative>), Bill Kearney
- Re: <script>alert('b0rk')</script> (was: Relationship between <title> <dc:title> and <dcterms:alternative>), Ben Hammersley
- RE: <script>alert('b0rk')</script> (was: Relationship between <title> <dc:title> and <dcterms:alternative>), Jon Hanna
- Markup in title element (was: Ben's being a smartass putting javascript in a title), Bill Kearney
- Re: Markup in title element (was: Ben's being a smartass putting javascript in a title), Ben Hammersley
- RE: Markup in title element (was: Ben's being a smartass putting javascript in a title), Jon Hanna
- Re: Markup in title element (was: Joe's being a smartass putting javascript in a title), Bill Kearney
- RE: Markup in title element (was: Ben's being a smartass putting javascript in a title), Jon Hanna
- Re: Markup in title element, Bill Kearney
- RE: Markup in title element, Jon Hanna
- Re: Markup in title element, Bill Kearney
- Re: Relationship between <title> <dc:title> and <dcterms:alternative>, Dan Brickley
- RE: mod_threading and representing email lists [Was: Re: Process: Extending the WG], Jon Hanna
- Re: mod_threading and representing email lists [Was: Re: Process: Extending the WG], Chris Croome
- RE: mod_threading and representing email lists [Was: Re: Process: Extending the WG], Jon Hanna
- Re: mod_threading and representing email lists [Was: Re: Process: Extending the WG], Seth Russell
- RE: mod_threading and representing email lists [Was: Re: Process: Extending the WG], Jon Hanna
- Re: mod_threading and representing email lists [Was: Re: Process: Extending the WG], Seth Russell
- RE: mod_threading and representing email lists [Was: Re: Process: Extending the WG], Jon Hanna
- Re: mod_threading and representing email lists [Was: Re: Process: Extending the WG], Seth Russell
- RE: mod_threading and representing email lists [Was: Re: Process: Extending the WG], Jon Hanna
- Re: mod_threading and representing email lists [Was: Re: Process: Extending the WG], Chris Croome
- RE: mod_threading and representing email lists [Was: Re:, Dan Brickley
- Re: mod_threading and representing email lists [Was: Re: Process: Extending the WG], Chris Croome
- Re: mod_threading and representing email lists [Was: Re: Process: Extending the WG], Joseph Reagle
- Re: mod_threading and representing email lists [Was: Re: Process: Extending the WG], Seth Russell
- Re: mod_threading and representing email lists [Was: Re: Process: Extending the WG], Joseph Reagle
- Re: mod_threading and representing email lists [Was: Re:, Dan Brickley
- Re: mod_threading and representing email lists [Was: Re: Process: Extending the WG], Joseph Reagle
- RE: Process: Extending the WG, Jon Hanna
- Re: Process: Extending the WG, burton
- [OT] Voting procedures [was RE: Process: Extending the WG], Jon Hanna
Bug in RSS 1.0 DC module documentation, Chris Croome
- Re: Bug in RSS 1.0 DC module documentation, burton
- Re: Bug in RSS 1.0 DC module documentation, Chris Croome
- Re: Bug in RSS 1.0 DC module documentation, Dan Brickley
- Re: Bug in RSS 1.0 DC module documentation, Chris Croome
- Re: Bug in RSS 1.0 DC module documentation, Bill Kearney
- Re: Bug in RSS 1.0 DC module documentation, burton
- RE: Bug in RSS 1.0 DC module documentation, Jon Hanna
- Vote needed for allowing elements to be repeated? [Was: Re: Bug in RSS 1.0 DC module documentation], Chris Croome
- Re: Vote needed for allowing elements to be repeated? [Was: Re: Bug in RSS 1.0 DC module documentation], Ben Hammersley
- RE: Vote needed for allowing elements to be repeated? [Was: Re: Bug in RSS 1.0 DC module documentation], Leigh Dodds
- Re: Vote needed for allowing elements to be repeated? [Was: Re: Bug in RSS 1.0 DC module documentation], Ben Hammersley
- Re: Vote needed for allowing elements to be repeated? [Was: Re: Bug in RSS 1.0 DC module documentation], Bill Kearney
- Extending the RSS 1.0 working group [Was: Re: Vote needed for allowing elements to be repeated? [Was: Bug...]], Chris Croome
- Re: Extending the RSS 1.0 working group [Was: Re: Vote needed for allowing elements to be repeated? [Was: Bug...]], Ben Hammersley
- RE: Extending the RSS 1.0 working group [Was: Re: Vote needed for allowing elements to be repeated? [Was: Bug...]], Jon Hanna
- Re: Vote needed for allowing elements to be repeated? [Was: Re: Bug in RSS 1.0 DC module documentation], Bill Kearney
- Re: Votes..., Morten Frederiksen
- Relationship between RSS and RDF [was: RE: Vote needed for allowing elements to be repeated? [Was: Re: Bug in RSS 1.0 DC module documentation]], Jon Hanna
- Relationship between RSS and RDF [was: RE: Vote needed for allowing elements to be repeated? [Was: Re: Bug in RSS 1.0 DC module documentation]], p2psmoke
- RE: Relationship between RSS and RDF [was: RE: Vote needed for allowing elements to be repeated? [Was: Re: Bug in RSS 1.0 DC module documentation]], Jon Hanna
- RE: Vote needed for allowing elements to be repeated? [Was: Re: Bug in RSS 1.0 DC module documentation], Jon Hanna
- Re: Vote needed for allowing elements to be repeated? [Was: Re: Bug in RSS 1.0 DC module documentation], Chris Croome
- RE: Vote needed for allowing elements to be repeated? [Was: Re: Bug in RSS 1.0 DC module documentation], Jon Hanna
- RDF hassles in XHTML?, Bill Kearney
- RE: RDF hassles in XHTML?, Jon Hanna
- Re: RDF hassles in XHTML?, Bill Kearney
- Re: RDF hassles in XHTML?, burton
- RE: RDF hassles in XHTML?, Jon Hanna
- RE: RDF hassles in XHTML?, Dan Brickley
- Re: RDF hassles in XHTML?, Bill Kearney
- Re: RDF hassles in XHTML?, Dan Brickley
- Re: RDF hassles in XHTML?, p2psmoke
- Re: Re: RDF hassles in XHTML?, Bill Kearney
- XML Schema, Jon Hanna
- Re: RDF hassles in XHTML?, Chris Croome
- Re: RDF hassles in XHTML?, Seth Russell
- Re: Bug in RSS 1.0 DC module documentation, burton
- RE: Bug in RSS 1.0 DC module documentation, Jon Hanna
mod_content should support 'abstract', burton
- Re: mod_content should support 'abstract', Bill Kearney
- RE: mod_content should support 'abstract', Jon Hanna
- Re: mod_content should support 'abstract', Bill Kearney
- RE: mod_content should support 'abstract', Jon Hanna
- Re: mod_content should support 'abstract', Bill Kearney
- RE: mod_content should support 'abstract', Jon Hanna
- Re: mod_content should support 'abstract', burton
- RE: mod_content should support 'abstract', Jon Hanna
- Re: mod_content should support 'abstract', Bill Kearney
- RE: mod_content should support 'abstract', Jon Hanna
- Re: mod_content should support 'abstract', burton
- Re: mod_content should support 'abstract', burton
- Re: mod_content should support 'abstract', burton
- Re: mod_content should support 'abstract', Bill Kearney
- RE: mod_content should support 'abstract', Jon Hanna
- Re: mod_content should support 'abstract', Bill Kearney
- Re: mod_content should support 'abstract', burton
- Re: mod_content should support 'abstract', burton
- RE: mod_content should support 'abstract', Jon Hanna
- Re: mod_content should support 'abstract', burton
- RE: mod_content should support 'abstract', Ken MacLeod
|
|
