|
|
March 30, 2001
- Re: Proposed Change to the Content Module, Aaron Swartz
- Re: Proposed Change to the Content Module, peteb
- Re: Proposed Change to the Content Module, Aaron Swartz
- Re: Proposed Change to the Content Module, peteb
- Re: Proposed Change to the Content Module, Aaron Swartz
- Re: Toying with an idea: RDF Protocol, Aaron Swartz
- Re: Proposed Change to the Content Module, peteb
- Re: Toying with an idea: RDF Protocol, Aaron Swartz
- Re: Error Module, Aaron Swartz
- Re: Proposed Change to the Content Module, Aaron Swartz
March 28, 2001
- Re: Toying with an idea: RDF Protocol, Aaron Swartz
- Re: Toying with an idea: RDF Protocol, Aaron Swartz
- Re: ANN: Fusion Juggler Radio, Bill Kearney
- RE: RE: ANN: Fusion Juggler Radio, Dave Seidel
- RE: RE: ANN: Fusion Juggler Radio, peteb
- RE: Re: assign an item to a geographic location, James Carlyle
- RE: ANN: Fusion Juggler Radio, Rael Dornfest
- Re: Re: Examplotron for rss 1.0 and request for comments, Eric van der Vlist
- Re: Re: Examplotron for rss 1.0 and request for comments, Eric van der Vlist
- Namespace RDDL Update, Aaron Swartz
- Re: content module questions, peteb
- ANN: Fusion Juggler Radio, peteb
- Re: Examplotron for rss 1.0 and request for comments, Aaron Swartz
March 23, 2001
- Proposed Change to the Content Module, Aaron Swartz
- Re: content module questions, Aaron Swartz
- content module questions, peteb
- Re: Blogify && Peerkat, Dan Lyke
- RE: Re: Blogify && Peerkat, Jeff Barr
- Re: Blogify && Peerkat, Aaron Swartz
- RE: Blogify && Peerkat, David Galbraith
- Re: Re: Blogify && Peerkat, Seth Russell
- Re: Blogify && Peerkat, Aaron Swartz
- Re: Blogify && Peerkat, Seth Russell
- Meerkat and Dublin Core, Cont'd., Rael Dornfest
- Re: Blogify && Peerkat, Bill Kearney
- Re: Blogify && Peerkat, Aaron Swartz
- RE: Re: Blogify && Peerkat, Jeff Barr
- Re: Re: Blogify && Peerkat, Morbus Iff
- Re: Blogify && Peerkat, Sean B. Palmer
- Re: Re: Blogify && Peerkat, Ian Graham
- Re: Blogify && Peerkat, Aaron Swartz
- Re: Blogify && Peerkat, Morbus Iff
- Re: Blogify && Peerkat, Aaron Swartz
- Re: Re: Blogify && Peerkat, Seth Russell
- Re: Blogify && Peerkat, Aaron Swartz
- Re: Re: Blogify && Peerkat, Morbus Iff
- Re: Blogify && Peerkat, Morbus Iff
- Re: Re: Blogify && Peerkat, Seth Russell
- Re: Blogify && Peerkat, Aaron Swartz
- Re: Re: Blogify && Peerkat, Seth Russell
- Re: Blogify && Peerkat, Aaron Swartz
- Re: Blogify && Peerkat, Sean B. Palmer
- Re: Blogify && Peerkat, Aaron Swartz
- Re: Re: Blogify && Peerkat, Seth Russell
- Re: Blogify && Peerkat, Aaron Swartz
March 21, 2001
- Channel Hierarchies, peteb
- Re: RDDL Namespace, Aaron Swartz
- Re: RDDL Namespace, Edd Dumbill
- RSS over SOAP, steve
- Re: RDDL Namespace, Jonathan Borden
- Re: RDDL Namespace, Aaron Swartz
- Re: Re: RDDL Namespace, Sean B. Palmer
- Re: RDDL Namespace, Aaron Swartz
- Re: RDDL Namespace, Sean B. Palmer
- RDDL Namespace, Aaron Swartz
- Mime-type Clarification, Aaron Swartz
March 09, 2001
- item_uri/link sub-element, peteb
- max item constraint [ was Re: min item requirement ], peteb
- Re: min item requirement, peteb
- Re: Re: Large RSS List XML Format (not OCS)..., Chris Croome
- Re: Re: taxo: summary, Eric van der Vlist
- Re: Re: Large RSS List XML Format (not OCS)..., Seth Russell
- Re: Re: Large RSS List XML Format (not OCS)..., Sean B. Palmer
- Re: Large RSS List XML Format (not OCS)..., Aaron Swartz
- Re: min item requirement, Aaron Swartz
- Re: Large RSS List XML Format (not OCS)..., Aaron Swartz
- Re: taxo: summary, Aaron Swartz
- RE: Re: taxo: summary, Dan Brickley
- Re: Large RSS List XML Format (not OCS)..., Aaron Swartz
- Re: Large RSS List XML Format (not OCS)..., Aaron Swartz
- Re: Re: Large RSS List XML Format (not OCS)..., Seth Russell
- RE: Re: Large RSS List XML Format (not OCS)..., Rael Dornfest
- RFC: Services Lists, Morbus Iff
- RE: Re: Large RSS List XML Format (not OCS)..., Rael Dornfest
- RE: Re: Large RSS List XML Format (not OCS)..., Rael Dornfest
- Re: Large RSS List XML Format (not OCS)..., Aaron Swartz
- Re: Large RSS List XML Format (not OCS)..., Aaron Swartz
- RE: Re: taxo: summary, Rael Dornfest
- Re: Call For Vote: RDDL Directory, Aaron Swartz
March 08, 2001
- Re: Call For Vote: RDDL Directory, Dan Brickley
- Re: Re: Large RSS List XML Format (not OCS)..., Sean B. Palmer
- Re: Large RSS List XML Format (not OCS)..., Aaron Swartz
- Re: Large RSS List XML Format (not OCS)..., Aaron Swartz
- Re: Large RSS List XML Format (not OCS)..., Aaron Swartz
- Call For Vote: RDDL Directory, Aaron Swartz
- Re: taxo: summary, Aaron Swartz
- RE: Re: taxo: summary, Rael Dornfest
- Re: Re: taxo: summary, Eric van der Vlist
- Re: Re: Large RSS List XML Format (not OCS)..., Seth Russell
- RE: Re: Large RSS List XML Format (not OCS)..., Leigh Dodds
- Re: Re: Large RSS List XML Format (not OCS)..., Seth Russell
- RE: Re: Large RSS List XML Format (not OCS)..., Leigh Dodds
- RE: Re: Large RSS List XML Format (not OCS)..., Rael Dornfest
- RE: Re: Large RSS List XML Format (not OCS)..., Morbus Iff
- Re: Re: New poll for rss-dev, Dan Brickley
- Re: Large RSS List XML Format (not OCS)..., Aaron Swartz
- Re: Large RSS List XML Format (not OCS)..., Aaron Swartz
- RE: Re: Large RSS List XML Format (not OCS)..., Rael Dornfest
- RE: Re: taxo: summary, Rael Dornfest
- RE: Re: Large RSS List XML Format (not OCS)..., Jeff Barr
- RE: Re: Large RSS List XML Format (not OCS)..., Rael Dornfest
- RE: Re: Large RSS List XML Format (not OCS)..., Rael Dornfest
- RE: Re: Large RSS List XML Format (not OCS)..., Leigh Dodds
- RE: Re: Large RSS List XML Format (not OCS)..., Leigh Dodds
- Re: taxo: summary, Aaron Swartz
- Re: Re: Large RSS List XML Format (not OCS)..., Morbus Iff
- Re: New poll for rss-dev, Aaron Swartz
- Re: Large RSS List XML Format (not OCS)..., Aaron Swartz
- Re: #PCDATA For Title&Description, Aaron Swartz
- [ANN] last call for reviews of PRISM metadata spec (fwd), Dan Brickley
- Content Module PURL, Rael Dornfest
- RE: Re: taxo: summary, Rael Dornfest
- Re: Re: taxo: summary, Eric van der Vlist
- Re: Section 5.3.2 of RSS RC1, peteb
- Re: min item requirement, peteb
- Re: #PCDATA For Title&Description, peteb
- Re: New poll for rss-dev, Dan Brickley
- Re: Re: Large RSS List XML Format (not OCS)..., Chris Croome
- Re: Large RSS List XML Format (not OCS)..., Aaron Swartz
- New poll for rss-dev, rss-dev-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw
- Re: Comments on RSS, Aaron Swartz
- Re: min item requirement, Aaron Swartz
- Re: Large RSS List XML Format (not OCS)..., Chris Croome
- RE: Large RSS List XML Format (not OCS)..., Rael Dornfest
- RE: Re: min item requirement, Rael Dornfest
- RE: Re: min item requirement, Dingley, Andy
- RE: Re: min item requirement, Rael Dornfest
- RE: Re: min item requirement, Rael Dornfest
- RE: Re: taxo: summary, Rael Dornfest
- RE: Re: Comments on RSS, Rael Dornfest
March 06, 2001
- Re: Comments on RSS, Aaron Swartz
- Re: taxo: summary, Aaron Swartz
- Re: taxo: summary, Aaron Swartz
- Re: Section 5.3.2 of RSS RC1, Aaron Swartz
- Re: Section 5.3.2 of RSS RC1, Aaron Swartz
- Re: #PCDATA For Title&Description, Aaron Swartz
- Re: min item requirement, Aaron Swartz
- RE: Re: handling 'extra' fields in RSS, Rael Dornfest
- Re: Section 5.3.2 of RSS RC1, peteb
- RE: Section 5.3.2 of RSS RC1, James Carlyle
- RE: Re: taxo: summary, Jason Diamond
- Section 5.3.2 of RSS RC1, peteb
- #PCDATA For Title&Description, peteb
- min item requirement, peteb
- FW: Comments on RSS, Leigh Dodds
- Re: Re: taxo: summary, hpyle
- Re: RDDL in RSS, jborden
- Re: taxo: summary, Aaron Swartz
March 05, 2001
- taxo: summary, hpyle
- Re: Re: RSS 1.0 vs. RSS 0.9* (david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx), Eric van der Vlist
- RE: Re: RSS 1.0 vs. RSS 0.9* (david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx), Leigh Dodds
- RE: RDDL in RSS, Leigh Dodds
- Re: RSS 1.0 vs. RSS 0.9* (david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx), Aaron Swartz
- RE: Re: RSS 1.0 vs. RSS 0.9* (david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx), David Megginson
- RE: Re: RSS 1.0 vs. RSS 0.9* (david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx), Nick Lothian
- re: Re: RSS 1.0 vs. RSS 0.9* (david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx), David Megginson
- RE: Re: RSS 1.0 vs. RSS 0.9, Mike Gunderloy
- Re: RSS 1.0 vs. RSS 0.9, Aaron Swartz
- Re: RSS 1.0 vs. RSS 0.9* (david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx), Aaron Swartz
- RE: Re: RSS 1.0 vs. RSS 0.9, Mike Gunderloy
- Re: Re: RSS 1.0 vs. RSS 0.9* (david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx), Dion Loy
|
|