|
Re: Why MD5 Headers are Imperative: msg#00613network.syndication.atom.protocol
> >Just an idea... > Thanks, but I don't think it's right to tell server managers that all they need to do in order to support APP is write some scripts which go through and renumber all their Atom ID's, particularly if said Atom ID allocation is RFC 4287 compliant. What I did, was extend the APP protocol to account for the fact that Atom-the- format says my feeds are perfectly valid as-is. I found that it really is not hard to interact with such a feed with a publishing client protocol, so IMHO re-engineering my entire Atom ID allocation is not really an attractive option. -EJB |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: By way of example.: 00613, Tim Bray |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Why MD5 Headers are Imperative: 00613, Bill de hÓra |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Why MD5 Headers are Imperativei: 00613, Kyle Marvin |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Why MD5 Headers are Imperative: 00613, Eric J. Bowman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |