|
Re: By way of example.: msg#00606network.syndication.atom.protocol
> >I beg to disapprove. You are making a mistake because you expect several >protocols to play through the same interface (GET, PUT, POST, etc.) with >a single URI. > http://example.com/service This is a URI collision even if the only thing it serves up is .atomsrv, even if I expect only one protocol (APP) to dereference this. If the returned Content-Location looks like /service for all users, this is clearly a URI collision. My solution, returning userid.atomsrv, is simply another form of the same URI collision inherent in the spec, no matter how radically various implementations diverge. You may not like my implementation but I guarantee you you cannot avoid the URI collision in yours, either, unless you restrict to one user. It's what the spec calls for. -EJB |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: PaceURINomenclature and PaceOnlyMemberURI: 00606, Joe Gregorio |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: PaceURINomenclature and PaceOnlyMemberURI: 00606, Elias Torres |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: By way of example.i: 00606, Bill de hÓra |
| Next by Thread: | Re: By way of example.: 00606, James M Snell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |