|
Re: Why MD5 Headers are Imperative: msg#00604network.syndication.atom.protocol
> >On the other hand, Eric Bowman's position seems to be, if I may >restate it, that most clients shouldn't need to know about minor >changes. > Thank you, Lisa. Close, but not quite -- I maintain that it is RFC 4287 which states that it is the publisher's decision whether or not to inform a client that an update has occurred, whereas APP maintains that all clients must be informed of all edits regardless. -EJB |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Why MD5 Headers are Imperative: 00604, Eric J. Bowman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: PaceURINomenclature and PaceOnlyMemberURI: 00604, Joe Gregorio |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Why MD5 Headers are Imperativei: 00604, Bill de hÓra |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Why MD5 Headers are Imperative: 00604, Tim Bray |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |