|
Re: PaceContentNegotiationSection: msg#00600network.syndication.atom.protocol
As others have asked, please explain the "URI collision". What do you mean by "URI collision"? - James Eric J. Bowman wrote: >> I think that is a bad assumption and is why we are having this discussion. >> Change the assumption and your implementation, put the service document on >> another URI, and the problems you are experiencing and having a hard time >> discussing with us should evaporate in thin air. >> > > Looking beyond my placement of the service document, there is still a URI > collision inherent in this setup, whether the URI is... > > http://example.com/ > > ...or... > > http://example.com/service > > Or anything else for that matter, the spec is still describing a URI > collision as I've tried to explain by showing what I return in Content- > Location. I'd still like to know what it is others are returning, /service > for every user? Going beyond a single-user setup, this will reliably serve > multiple resources at the same URI. > > -EJB > > > > |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: PaceContentNegotiationSection: 00600, James M Snell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: PaceNoServiceDocument - Re: Some feedback on current APP issues: 00600, Michael Wechner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: PaceContentNegotiationSectioni: 00600, Eric J. Bowman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: PaceContentNegotiationSection: 00600, Eric J. Bowman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |