Re: PaceURINomenclature and PaceOnlyMemberURI

On Aug 18, 2006, at 3:32 PM, Elias Torres wrote:

> Hmmm.. That's a good point of view. Is the definition of 'self' in an
> earlier today that it must the full Atom representation of the entry
> correct? If so, wouldn't that say that client developers can always  
> use
> it as a fallback mechanism *if* the member URI returns 409 let's say?

As far as I know, the APP doesn't mention <link rel="self"> -Tim

> -Elias