Re: PaceURINomenclature and PaceOnlyMemberURI

2006/8/19, Elias Torres:
> Kyle Marvin wrote:
> >
> > For the record, POMU doesn't prevent you from splitting them... in
> > fact it says *nothing* about the self URI.
> >
>
> Hmmm.. That's a good point of view. Is the definition of 'self' in an
> earlier today that it must the full Atom representation of the entry
> correct?

No

> If so, wouldn't that say that client developers can always use
> it as a fallback mechanism *if* the member URI returns 409 let's say?

Definitely no.

Actually, 'self' would have been called 'content-location' as it's
really what it has been designed to be: putting the Content-Location
or request URI into the feed or entry, so that if headers or the
request-URI is not communicated to, say, the aggregator, this one has
the feed URI nonetheless.

--
Thomas Broyer