Re: PaceURINomenclature and PaceOnlyMemberURI

On 8/18/06, James M Snell <jasnell-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:
> I just wanted to close the loop on these

There's no good reason for the edit URI not to respond to GET. It's
sort of crazy not to. This doesn't prevent the server from making
read-only links elsewhere.

--

Robert Sayre

"I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time."