Re: PaceURINomenclature and PaceOnlyMemberURI

2006/8/18, James M Snell:
> I just wanted to close the loop on these as the discussion seems to have
> gone off in other directions.
>
> I'm fine either either pace.  I'm able to produce code that just works
> with both approaches.  +0 to both.

+1 to PaceOnlyMemberURI, *that's* RESTful !!!

-1 to PaceURINomenclature

--
Thomas Broyer