|
|
Re: PaceNoServiceDocument - Re: Some feedback on current APP issues: msg#00577
network.syndication.atom.protocol
|
Subject: |
Re: PaceNoServiceDocument - Re: Some feedback on current APP issues |
As I said I won't push hard to remove it even if I still don't find the
service document of much use. So I'll refrain complaining about it if
the majority is willing to keep it for reasons I still cannot see :)
- Sylvain
Kyle Marvin a écrit :
On 8/18/06, Tim Bray <Tim.Bray-xsfywfwIY+M@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Aug 18, 2006, at 2:05 AM, Sylvain Hellegouarch wrote:
>
>
>> well, I think introspection/service document is very handy
>
> If only someone could provide more than just that. Who is it useful
> for?
> What value does it bring? How is it used? Which context?
Speaking as one who's currently working on an APP client, I find the
service doc to be easy to understand, and a natural tool for
bootstrapping client operations. I can't imagine why we'd want to do
away with it -Tim
+1. As supporting data, I'll repeat that we launched the Google
Calendar Data API without such a capability and received significant
user feedback that they needed a way to list user calendars (aka
collections).
|
|