Re: PaceURINomenclature and PaceOnlyMemberURI

I think they are both easy to implement but I lean towards
PaceURINomenclature because it gives me the option of separating my
edit-uri from self-uri. After looking at all the discussion it feels to
me like we are splitting hairs, so whichever way it goes I'll update my
implementation and offer it again for others to experiment.

+1 PaceURINomenclature

+0 PaceOnlyMemberURI

-Elias

James M Snell wrote:
> I just wanted to close the loop on these as the discussion seems to have
> gone off in other directions.
> 
> I'm fine either either pace.  I'm able to produce code that just works
> with both approaches.  +0 to both.
> 
> - James
> 
>