logo       

Re: Posted PaceURINomenclature: msg#00571

network.syndication.atom.protocol

Subject: Re: Posted PaceURINomenclature


On 8/18/06, Bill de hÓra <bill-h1s9WT/giYOsTnJN9+BGXg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I believe GET on the edit URI is assured to be undefined.

The PACE says "The Edit URI may respond to GET requests, but client
software MUST NOT rely on this"

How about "unreliable" instead of "undefined"? :)




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise