|
Re: Posted PaceURINomenclature: msg#00571network.syndication.atom.protocol
On 8/18/06, Bill de hÓra <bill-h1s9WT/giYOsTnJN9+BGXg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The PACE says "The Edit URI may respond to GET requests, but client software MUST NOT rely on this" How about "unreliable" instead of "undefined"? :) |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Posted PaceURINomenclature: 00571, Bill de hÓra |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: By way of example.: 00571, Eric J. Bowman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Posted PaceURINomenclaturei: 00571, Bill de hÓra |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Posted PaceURINomenclature: 00571, Tim Bray |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |