On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 15:02:14 +0200, Thomas Broyer <t.broyer-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
- so finally, the rel="edit" link in the collection feed merely only
serves as a flag telling clients that the entry is editable, clients
can then dereference the rel="self" URI to retrieve the entry, and
then use the rel="edit" URI found within it (if the rel="edit" from
the feed and rel="edit" from the standalone entry differ, I think the
one from the entry document is the authoritative one)
+1! rel="edit" in correlation with atom:id gives the client enough
information to start editing a particular entry. Having it all in the feed
makes it much more intuitive.
--
Asbjørn Ulsberg -=|=-
http://virtuelvis.com/quark/
«He's a loathsome offensive brute, yet I can't look away»
