Re: Why MD5 Headers are Imperative

Elliotte Harold wrote:

> Eric J. Bowman wrote:
>
> > You cannot reject, point by point, a solution on its surface when you 
> > have not attempted to understand or refute the problem it solves.  I 
> > reject your "-1's" on my solution until you explain to me why this is 
> > true:
> >
> > "The Member URI may be used to retrieve an representation of the 
> > resource, period."
> >
> > This is where your train has gone off the tracks, I'm afraid.  
> > Because your statement assumes that there is only one possible 
> > representation of that resource.  I have two, because the Atom Format 
> > specifically allows me two.
>
> Again, you seem to be reading things in that aren't there. If the 
> claim was "The Member URI may be used to retrieve *the* representation 
> of the resource,  period." then I could see your point, but it isn't. 
> The claim is only that Member URI may be used to retrieve some 
> representation of the resource. There's no claim made here that this 
> is the only representation.


maybe just this sentence needs to be written more clearly resp. some 
examples added

Michi

>


--
Michael Wechner
Wyona      -   Open Source Content Management   -    Apache Lenya
http://www.wyona.com                      http://lenya.apache.org
michael.wechner-m0ku3nyLTiYAvxtiuMwx3w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                        
michi-1oDqGaOF3Lkdnm+yROfE0A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
+41 44 272 91 61