|
Re: Why MD5 Headers are Imperative: msg#00509network.syndication.atom.protocol
Eric J. Bowman wrote: Here's the logical fallacy in the APP: It looks to me like the logical fallacy is yours. I don't see how the first sentence implies the second. In fact, I can think of several counter-examples. For instance, the resource may *be* a collection of database fields shredded into a relational database, while the representation may be an XML document. Many other counterexamples spring to mind. -- Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo-0kov8M1whMKClA2aSBCtbg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Java I/O 2nd Edition Just Published! http://www.cafeaulait.org/books/javaio2/ http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596527500/ref=nosim/cafeaulaitA/ |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: PaceNoServiceDocument - Re: Some feedback on current APP issues: 00509, Michael Wechner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Why MD5 Headers are Imperative: 00509, Elliotte Harold |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Why MD5 Headers are Imperativei: 00509, Julian Reschke |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Why MD5 Headers are Imperative: 00509, Eric J. Bowman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |