Re: Why MD5 Headers are Imperative

James M Snell wrote:

> I've implemented no less than four APP server implementations and three
> clients.  I've tested my clients against about seven different server
> implementations, including three implementations from other vendors. I
> have yet to encounter any problem with the text you are claiming is
> broken.  Working code counts for a lot.
>  


it would be nice if you could provide a list of the various APP server 
implementations and clients
such that one can dig in there (in case the code is available) and see 
how you or anyone else did it.

Otherwise I am afraid it sounds just like Fermat's "last words":

http://www-groups.dcs.st-and.ac.uk/~history/Quotations/Fermat.html

Thanks

Michi

> - James
>
> Eric J. Bowman wrote:
>  
>
> > I am astonished at the lack of concern here for the key element of what I'm 
> > saying:
> >
> > I have a fully RFC-compliant Atom deployment.  It only breaks when I attempt 
> > to implement _your_ spec.  With _my_ spec it works beautifully and is still 
> > a fully RFC-compliant Atom deployment, with PUT.
> >
> > Doesn't working code count for anything?  Not that I can back that up 
> > publicly just yet, but how about some benefit of the doubt?
> >
> > -EJB
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >    
>
>
>  


--
Michael Wechner
Wyona      -   Open Source Content Management   -    Apache Lenya
http://www.wyona.com                      http://lenya.apache.org
michael.wechner-m0ku3nyLTiYAvxtiuMwx3w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                        
michi-1oDqGaOF3Lkdnm+yROfE0A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
+41 44 272 91 61