|
Re: Why MD5 Headers are Imperative: msg#00492network.syndication.atom.protocol
On 18/8/06 9:42 AM, "Eric J. Bowman" <eric-MkmoNbc1SAncr/OS1auqaA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > "Once a resource has been created and its URI is known, that URI > can be used to retrieve, update, and delete the resource. " > > This asserts that the edit representation MUST be identical to the _resource_ I don't read that sentence as asserting that. I know that retrievals of a resource are via representations since resources are a conceptual thing, never bits on a wire. I also know that however that representation may appear, it may well have absolutely zero correlation as to how it is stored at the other end (whether in XML, or a comma-delimited file, or some binary structure in memory, or fractured shards scattered across several SQL tables, or arrangements of knots in a piece of string). The protocol concerns itself with the communication between server and client, it doesn't (shouldn't) have anything to say about what the server does behind the scenes. e. |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Why MD5 Headers are Imperative: 00492, Eric Scheid |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Why MD5 Headers are Imperative: 00492, Eric J. Bowman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Why MD5 Headers are Imperativei: 00492, Roy T. Fielding |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Why MD5 Headers are Imperative: 00492, Julian Reschke |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |