logo       

Re: Why MD5 Headers are Imperative: msg#00492

network.syndication.atom.protocol

Subject: Re: Why MD5 Headers are Imperative


On 18/8/06 9:42 AM, "Eric J. Bowman"
<eric-MkmoNbc1SAncr/OS1auqaA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> "Once a resource has been created and its URI is known, that URI
> can be used to retrieve, update, and delete the resource. "
>
> This asserts that the edit representation MUST be identical to the _resource_

I don't read that sentence as asserting that. I know that retrievals of a
resource are via representations since resources are a conceptual thing,
never bits on a wire. I also know that however that representation may
appear, it may well have absolutely zero correlation as to how it is stored
at the other end (whether in XML, or a comma-delimited file, or some binary
structure in memory, or fractured shards scattered across several SQL
tables, or arrangements of knots in a piece of string).

The protocol concerns itself with the communication between server and
client, it doesn't (shouldn't) have anything to say about what the server
does behind the scenes.



e.




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise