|
Re: Why MD5 Headers are Imperative: msg#00481network.syndication.atom.protocol
On 8/17/06, Paul Hoffman <phoffman-O6w3ZxSwtmQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
While I agree with Eric that good proposals are quite likely to be ignorantly "shot down in a flurry of '-1's' " by this WG's hard chargers[1], I agree with Paul on this specific issue. [1] http://www.zefrank.com/theforum/showthread.php?t=18 -- Robert Sayre "I would have written a shorter letter, but I did not have the time." |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Why MD5 Headers are Imperative: 00481, Eric J. Bowman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: PaceOnlyMemberURI: 00481, Roy T. Fielding |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Why MD5 Headers are Imperativei: 00481, Paul Hoffman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Why MD5 Headers are Imperative: 00481, Eric J. Bowman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |