Re: Why MD5 Headers are Imperative

>
>Sure. I did not hear anyone saying that they thought the problem was 
>as bad as you thought, and others have said they don't understand 
>what you are saying. Until there is strong agreement that there is a 
>serious problem, we should not consider a solution such as that would 
>be difficult to implement. "Change HTTP" seems pretty darn difficult.
>

The other alternative is "Change RFC 4287" as I see it.  I still am unsure 
how this would be expressed in a Pace -- "PaceAllowPrincipleOfOrthogonality", 
perhaps?  There is no direct, one-to-one relationship between a resource and 
a representation, and a protocol which flies against this cannot possibly 
meet any 80/20 reasonableness standard.

-EJB