|
Re: Why MD5 Headers are Imperative: msg#00465network.syndication.atom.protocol
Eric J. Bowman wrote: > And I think you guys are making this waaaaay too simple by asserting a one-to- > one relationship between resource and representation which exists nowhere > else in web development, certainly not in RFCs 4287 or 2616. > No one, to my knowledge, has made any such assertion. > I really do not care whether or not anybody adapts my solution. The solution > is simply not relevant yet. What I do care about is that the working group > acknowledges the underlying contradiction that I have brought up, and in that > respect it feels like I'm talking to a brick wall. :( > I think it's been made rather clear that folks either have no idea what you're talking about or disagree with your position. - James |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Why MD5 Headers are Imperative: 00465, Eric J. Bowman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Why MD5 Headers are Imperative: 00465, James M Snell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Why MD5 Headers are Imperativei: 00465, Eric J. Bowman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Why MD5 Headers are Imperative: 00465, Eric J. Bowman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |