On 17 Aug 2006, at 14:40, Eric J. Bowman wrote:
All,
I was wondering (and please if it has been already discussed let
me know)
but should not it be more relevant to create an extension to RFC
4287 to
specify feed paging and then refer to it from the APP
specification? I've
always thought the collection paging was not fitting well the
draft per
se.
Thoughts?
I was wondering this too. I haven't had time to look into this yet:
http://opensearch.a9.com/spec/1.1/querysyntax/
Given that w3c also has XQUERY, it seems to me that it is desirable to
describe a search endpoint in the service document, and what query
languages
it accepts. This could also remove the need for order-by-anything,
somehow I think maybe.
But I think a search endpoint was discussed and rejected already?
writing general purpose search endpoints is really complex. There is
one being developed by the W3C called SPARQL. Combine Atom, AtomOwl
and SPARQL and you get
http://intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceSparqlLink
Henry
Foaf name:
http://bblfish.net/people/henry/card#me
-EJB
- Sylvain
