logo       

Re: Collection paging section usefulness: msg#00437

network.syndication.atom.protocol

Subject: Re: Collection paging section usefulness


>
>All,
>
>I was wondering (and please if it has been already discussed let me know)
>but should not it be more relevant to create an extension to RFC 4287 to
>specify feed paging and then refer to it from the APP specification? I've
>always thought the collection paging was not fitting well the draft per
>se.
>
>Thoughts?
>

I was wondering this too. I haven't had time to look into this yet:

http://opensearch.a9.com/spec/1.1/querysyntax/

Given that w3c also has XQUERY, it seems to me that it is desirable to
describe a search endpoint in the service document, and what query languages
it accepts. This could also remove the need for order-by-anything, somehow I
think maybe.

But I think a search endpoint was discussed and rejected already?

-EJB

>
>- Sylvain
>
>





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise