|
Re: Collection paging section usefulness: msg#00437network.syndication.atom.protocol
> >All, > >I was wondering (and please if it has been already discussed let me know) >but should not it be more relevant to create an extension to RFC 4287 to >specify feed paging and then refer to it from the APP specification? I've >always thought the collection paging was not fitting well the draft per >se. > >Thoughts? > I was wondering this too. I haven't had time to look into this yet: http://opensearch.a9.com/spec/1.1/querysyntax/ Given that w3c also has XQUERY, it seems to me that it is desirable to describe a search endpoint in the service document, and what query languages it accepts. This could also remove the need for order-by-anything, somehow I think maybe. But I think a search endpoint was discussed and rejected already? -EJB > >- Sylvain > > |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Collection paging section usefulness: 00437, Sylvain Hellegouarch |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Collection paging section usefulness: 00437, Henry Story |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Collection paging section usefulnessi: 00437, Andreas Sewe |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Collection paging section usefulness: 00437, Henry Story |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |