|
Re: Why MD5 Headers are Imperative: msg#00435network.syndication.atom.protocol
> >It seems you have done a lot of work and I'm sure your design model works >perfectly but I am still not convinced this would be beneficial out of >your context. > I have no problem with agreeing to disagree with you on that issue, I realize I'm making rather a bold statement here, but "my context" is RFCs 4287 / 2616. -EJB |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Why MD5 Headers are Imperative: 00435, Sylvain Hellegouarch |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Collection paging section usefulness: 00435, Sylvain Hellegouarch |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Why MD5 Headers are Imperativei: 00435, Sylvain Hellegouarch |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Why MD5 Headers are Imperative: 00435, Eric J. Bowman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |