|
Re: Why MD5 Headers are Imperative: msg#00416network.syndication.atom.protocol
Here's the server-side resource, no "representation" to it, this is the whole enchilada: http://canuck.bisonsystems.net/dev/atom/entry-server-2.xml Here's the client-side, writable representation retrieved by an APP client: http://canuck.bisonsystems.net/dev/atom/entry-server-2.xml Here's the read-only representation with eTag=atom:id+atom:updated for the majority of use cases, which are read-only and do not even see the <p/> tag: http://canuck.bisonsystems.net/dev/atom/entry-server-3.xml In my implementation, editors can move that <p/> tag around all they want without altering the published read-only representation, provided an Atom- friendly publishing protocol... Go back to my first post. All other conversations aside, this is why I'm here despite my desire to have remained an anonymous lurker. I'm still working this out myself, but I think I've nailed down the basic contradiction. -EJB |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Why MD5 Headers are Imperative: 00416, Eric J. Bowman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: PaceAppModified: 00416, Eric J. Bowman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Why MD5 Headers are Imperativei: 00416, Henry Story |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Why MD5 Headers are Imperative: 00416, Julian Reschke |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |