logo       

Re: PaceOrderCollectionsByAppModified2: msg#00136

network.syndication.atom.protocol

Subject: Re: PaceOrderCollectionsByAppModified2




Eric Scheid wrote:
> [snip]
> So ... the options we have available are (1) make sort order undefined, (2)
> make sort order variable, (3) leave sort order broken (ie. atom:updated) ...
> which leaves out option (4) define one, useful, sort order.
>

This begs the question about whether or not sorting by atom:updated is
broken. It may not be useful for sync, but that doesn't mean it's broken.

- James




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise