|
Re: PaceOrderCollectionsByAppModified2: msg#00136network.syndication.atom.protocol
Eric Scheid wrote: > [snip] > So ... the options we have available are (1) make sort order undefined, (2) > make sort order variable, (3) leave sort order broken (ie. atom:updated) ... > which leaves out option (4) define one, useful, sort order. > This begs the question about whether or not sorting by atom:updated is broken. It may not be useful for sync, but that doesn't mean it's broken. - James |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: AtomPubIssuesList for 2006/08/07: 00136, Eric Scheid |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: AtomPubIssuesList for 2006/08/07: 00136, Sam Ruby |
| Previous by Thread: | PaceOrderCollectionsByAppModified2i: 00136, Eric Scheid |
| Next by Thread: | Re: PaceOrderCollectionsByAppModified2: 00136, Eric Scheid |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |