|
Re: cannot re-connect: msg#00006network.spread.user
On 12/1/06, Jonathan Stanton <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: This is a known limitation of TCP connections, if the server socket is Aaah ...perfect that's what I was missing :) However, you can set it to always reuse the port number by changing the Sure If you set it to ON you will not have a problem with restarting the OK ...working now :) I understand your idea for a SpreadConnection.isConnected(), in many Well, the question is - when do I know I have to re-establish the connection to spread? IMO there is no obvious way to find out. Just getting a SpreadConnection when trying to send a message is a bit of a weak contract. Who knows what else could be the possible cause of the exception ...as it is a pretty generic exception. So I thought I could check whether the connection is still intact once I get an exception - but there is no such thing to check. See the problem? Any idea? cheers -- Torsten |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Spread 4 Solaris build failures: 00006, Alec H. Peterson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Corrupt packets: 00006, Alec H. Peterson |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: cannot re-connecti: 00006, Jonathan Stanton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Multiple spread daemons on the same machine &real-time scheduling?: 00006, Matt Garman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |