osdir.com
mailing list archive

Subject: Re: Privsep question: can the slave's child make monitor calls? - msg#00399

List: network.openssh.devel

Date: Prev Next Index Thread: Prev Next Index
Niels Provos wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 12:49:22PM +0100, Markus Friedl wrote:
> > no, i think (e) should _not_ talk to the monitor.
> Those descriptors are all close on exec.

The situation I was describing was sshd deliberately calling a monitor
function after the fork but before the exec.

I suspect Markus is right and I shouldn't do that, in which case I need
to figure out another way to solve my problem.

--
Darren Tucker (dtucker at zip.com.au)
GPG key 8FF4FA69 / D9A3 86E9 7EEE AF4B B2D4 37C9 C982 80C7 8FF4 FA69
Good judgement comes with experience. Unfortunately, the experience
usually comes from bad judgement.


Was this page helpful?
Yes No
Thread at a glance:

Previous Message by Date: click to view message preview

Re: Privsep question: can the slave's child make monitor calls?

On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 12:49:22PM +0100, Markus Friedl wrote: > no, i think (e) should _not_ talk to the monitor. Those descriptors are all close on exec. Niels.

Next Message by Date: click to view message preview

Snapshots not updating?

Is there a problem with the snapshots? The newest one on ftp.ca.openbsd.org is a week old. -Daz. -- Darren Tucker (dtucker at zip.com.au) GPG key 8FF4FA69 / D9A3 86E9 7EEE AF4B B2D4 37C9 C982 80C7 8FF4 FA69 Good judgement comes with experience. Unfortunately, the experience usually comes from bad judgement.

Previous Message by Thread: click to view message preview

Re: Privsep question: can the slave's child make monitor calls?

On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 12:49:22PM +0100, Markus Friedl wrote: > no, i think (e) should _not_ talk to the monitor. Those descriptors are all close on exec. Niels.

Next Message by Thread: click to view message preview

PermitRootLogin=yes no longer lets root login

Hi All, While testing another patch, I found that I could not longer log in as root, even if PermitRootLogin was yes. It seems to be the following code in auth_password: $ cvs diff -r1.48 -r1.49 auth-passwd.c [snip] #ifndef HAVE_CYGWIN - if (pw->pw_uid == 0 && options.permit_root_login != PERMIT_YES) + if (pw->pw_uid == 0 && options.permit_root_login != PERMIT_NO_PASSWD) return 0; #endif [snip] Was this intentional? -Daz. -- Darren Tucker (dtucker at zip.com.au) GPG key 8FF4FA69 / D9A3 86E9 7EEE AF4B B2D4 37C9 C982 80C7 8FF4 FA69 Good judgement comes with experience. Unfortunately, the experience usually comes from bad judgement.
Sign up for updates to this mailing list. email:
Loading Comments...
Home | News | Patents | Sitemap | FAQ | advertise

Advertising by