Re: [f-nsp] Transparent VLL between XMR and Juniper T-series

David,

 From release 3.8.00 both VLLs and VPLS instances support dual mode  
ports (i.e. both tagged and untagged Ethernet frames), unless you   
really want to support transparent VLANs (similar to QinQ)?

If your trying to do transparent VLANs try changing the ethtype on  
the VLL edge port, like:

NetIron(config)# tag-type 9100 e 3/1

...and ensure the VLL edge port is untagged.

Colin


On 11/04/2008, at 12:34 PM, David Ball wrote:
>   Is it possible to build a transparent VLL from an XMR?  I've
> successfully got a VLL running between an XMR and a Juniper, with the
> XMR endpoint specified as 'untagged' and the VLL in 'raw-mode'.  If I
> send untagged traffic, all is well.  As soon as I send tagged traffic,
> it breaks.  Given the 'untagged' command for the XMR endpoint, I guess
> I'm not surprised, but I'd ideally like to be able to receive untagged
> OR tagged traffic and just send it to the far end (ie. transparent,
> not caring if tagged or untagged).  I'd rather not have to
> manage/maintain any VLANs that the customer may be sending us, but I'm
> still trying to get my head around how it might be done (do I use
> raw-mode or not?  Is the XMR endpoint untagged or tagged if I don't
> want to 'care'?).  Nudges in the right direction would be appreciated.
>
> David
> _______________________________________________
> foundry-nsp mailing list
> foundry-nsp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp

_______________________________________________
foundry-nsp mailing list
foundry-nsp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp