|
[f-nsp] Transparent VLL between XMR and Juniper T-series: msg#00018network.nsp.foundry
Is it possible to build a transparent VLL from an XMR? I've successfully got a VLL running between an XMR and a Juniper, with the XMR endpoint specified as 'untagged' and the VLL in 'raw-mode'. If I send untagged traffic, all is well. As soon as I send tagged traffic, it breaks. Given the 'untagged' command for the XMR endpoint, I guess I'm not surprised, but I'd ideally like to be able to receive untagged OR tagged traffic and just send it to the far end (ie. transparent, not caring if tagged or untagged). I'd rather not have to manage/maintain any VLANs that the customer may be sending us, but I'm still trying to get my head around how it might be done (do I use raw-mode or not? Is the XMR endpoint untagged or tagged if I don't want to 'care'?). Nudges in the right direction would be appreciated. David _______________________________________________ foundry-nsp mailing list foundry-nsp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/foundry-nsp |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [f-nsp] Verbose logging on NetIron XMR: 00018, Erich Hohermuth |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [f-nsp] Transparent VLL between XMR and Juniper T-series: 00018, Colin Horsington |
| Previous by Thread: | [f-nsp] Verbose logging on NetIron XMRi: 00018, David Ball |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [f-nsp] Transparent VLL between XMR and Juniper T-series: 00018, Colin Horsington |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |