|
RE: NSE-1 vs. NPE-400: msg#00186network.nsp.cisco
The NPE-400s are pretty solid blades and they take up to 512 MB of RAM. I tend to stay away from the NSE-1 because of the cost and from past experience, I still don't think Cisco has gotten PXF to work quite right. That said, I do have a customer who has been using an NSE-1 for about a year and it's been pretty stable for him, but also his configuration is pretty 'vanilla'. If you don't specifically need a -400 or an NSE-1, you can probably also pick up reasonably well-fitted NPE-300s dirt-cheap. jms > On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Temkin, David wrote: > > > I understand that, but the NPE-G1 isn't available used generally and it's > > out of the price range for the current project I'm working on new. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | RE: NSE-1 vs. NPE-400: 00186, Arie Vayner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Cisco SNMP info: 00186, Nick Kraal |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: NSE-1 vs. NPE-400i: 00186, Arie Vayner |
| Next by Thread: | Cisco SNMP info: 00186, Nick Kraal |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |