|
Re: NSE-1 vs. NPE-400: msg#00184network.nsp.cisco
On Mon, 11 Aug 2003, Gert Doering wrote: > You might also want to take the NPE-G1 into consideration. That's a > real great one - super fast, and comes with 3 onboard GigE interfaces. > > Caveat: requires 12.1E or 12.2S, but 12.2S is well-beahving for us. We looked into this somewhat recently. NPE-G1's are apparently much more $ than say an NPE400...perhaps 2x as much IIRC. Speaking of 12.2S...has anyone else had a 7200 running 12.2.14S3 start dropping 50% icmp destined for the router? We had one do this (CPU and traffic loads were normal). A reboot fixed it. I then downgraded to 12.2.14S1, in the hope that it would not happen again...and it hasn't yet. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis *jlewis@xxxxxxxxx*| I route System Administrator | therefore you are Atlantic Net | _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | cricket/mrtg & GSR memory/cpu: 00184, matthew zeier |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: NSE-1 vs. NPE-400: 00184, Arie Vayner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: NSE-1 vs. NPE-400i: 00184, Gert Doering |
| Next by Thread: | RE: NSE-1 vs. NPE-400: 00184, Temkin, David |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |