|
Re: NSE-1 vs. NPE-400: msg#00181network.nsp.cisco
hi, On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 02:47:02PM -0400, Temkin, David wrote: > Just a quick question to anyone- search results on this have been pretty > slim. > > Which am I better off with in an environment with large ACL's and two full > BGP feeds, the NSE-1 or NPE-400? The NSE-1 is still more expensive than the > NPE-400 (though used it depends)... I understand the "accelerated" services > that the NSE-1 gives you, but does that take enough load off of the > processor to make it a better bet than the NPE-400? You might also want to take the NPE-G1 into consideration. That's a real great one - super fast, and comes with 3 onboard GigE interfaces. Caveat: requires 12.1E or 12.2S, but 12.2S is well-beahving for us. Caveat2: 12.2S has counter bugs. But not-so-severe ones. gert -- USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW! //www.muc.de/~gert/ Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx fax: +49-89-35655025 gert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | RE: NSE-1 vs. NPE-400: 00181, Temkin, David |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Smartnet Matrix ???: 00181, Buhrmaster, Gary |
| Previous by Thread: | NSE-1 vs. NPE-400i: 00181, Temkin, David |
| Next by Thread: | Re: NSE-1 vs. NPE-400: 00181, jlewis |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |