logo       

Re: NSE-1 vs. NPE-400: msg#00181

network.nsp.cisco

Subject: Re: NSE-1 vs. NPE-400

hi,

On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 02:47:02PM -0400, Temkin, David wrote:
> Just a quick question to anyone- search results on this have been pretty
> slim.
>
> Which am I better off with in an environment with large ACL's and two full
> BGP feeds, the NSE-1 or NPE-400? The NSE-1 is still more expensive than the
> NPE-400 (though used it depends)... I understand the "accelerated" services
> that the NSE-1 gives you, but does that take enough load off of the
> processor to make it a better bet than the NPE-400?

You might also want to take the NPE-G1 into consideration. That's a
real great one - super fast, and comes with 3 onboard GigE interfaces.

Caveat: requires 12.1E or 12.2S, but 12.2S is well-beahving for us.

Caveat2: 12.2S has counter bugs. But not-so-severe ones.

gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
//www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany gert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
fax: +49-89-35655025 gert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise