|
RE: MPPP vs CEF: msg#00134network.nsp.cisco
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, Duane de Witt wrote: > The CPU load shoots up possibly because of the fragmentation that happens. > Disable multilink fragmentation and see what happens. I'll give that a try next time I try MPPP...but I'm still concerned about this: FWIW, one other serious downside I noticed with multilink was any changes to the multilink interface (including adding/removing members) seemed to stop the flow of traffic momentarily (I remember this being a problem when I used to use ISDN and the second B channel would come up on demand) and doing something like "no cdp enable" would cause the multilink interface to flap. For this reason, is it best to split up the T1's into more than one multilink group and do per destination load sharing with the multiple multilink interfaces? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis *jlewis@xxxxxxxxx*| I route System Administrator | therefore you are Atlantic Net | _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Traffic balancing problem: 00134, Lucas Iglesias |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | terminating DSL VLANs/Tunnels (spec. bell nexxia, canada): 00134, Dave [Hawk-Systems] |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: MPPP vs CEFi: 00134, Duane de Witt |
| Next by Thread: | throttle a 2900 switch bit-rate: 00134, Paul Plantinga |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |