|
RE: MPPP vs CEF: msg#00129network.nsp.cisco
Hi The CPU load shoots up possibly because of the fragmentation that happens. Disable multilink fragmentation and see what happens. Regards Duane -----Original Message----- From: jlewis@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:jlewis@xxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 6:00 AM To: cisco-nsp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [nsp] MPPP vs CEF Today I tried converting a 6xT1 connection between a 7206 and 3640 from CEF load sharing to multilink PPP. The routers involved are: 7206 NPE200 12.2(14)S3 (I doubt this end is relevant) 3640 12.2(17a) NM-1FE, 2x NM-4T The 3640 only has the 6 T1's to the 7206 (2 ports currently unused) and a the FE feeding the LAN. The 3640's FE port typically peaks at about 6mbit/s out, 2mbit/s in. CPU load ranges from about 15% middle of the night, 50-85% during the day/evening. CEF is enabled on all interfaces. We've gotten some complaints about VOIP jitter, so first I switched the T1's from per packet to per destination load sharing. The for some reason, I decided to give multilink PPP a try. As soon as I converted the T1's to encaps PPP and put them in multilink-group 1, CPU load shot up from 50% to 94%. Over the next hour, the CPU load rose to about 99% at which point the 3640's CLI became rather unresponsive and pings to the 3640 varied from sub-100ms, to as bad as 50000ms! Did I run into a bug in 12.2(17a) (this same version had serious CPU load issues on some of our other 3640's) or is multilink still expected to eat lots of CPU even in versions where it's CEF switched? While the load was 95-99%, show proc cpu didn't show any processes actually using any noticable amounts of CPU time. For now, it's back to CEF per destination load sharing. FWIW, one other serious downside I noticed with multilink was any changes to the multilink interface (including adding/removing members) seemed to stop the flow of traffic momentarily (I remember this being a problem when I used to use ISDN and the second B channel would come up on demand) and doing something like "no cdp enable" would cause the multilink interface to flap. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis *jlewis@xxxxxxxxx*| I route System Administrator | therefore you are Atlantic Net | _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | MPPP vs CEF: 00129, jlewis |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: 12.3T - a niiiiice feature :): 00129, Tomas Daniska |
| Previous by Thread: | MPPP vs CEFi: 00129, jlewis |
| Next by Thread: | RE: MPPP vs CEF: 00129, jlewis |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |