|
Re: 12.3T - a niiiiice feature :): msg#00116network.nsp.cisco
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 11:03:53AM -0400, Jared Mauch wrote: > We've taken to as-much-automation-as-possible in this realm. > here's a trivia question for you (and other readers): > > If cisco provided a way to generate your machine-readable > configuration and ship it to the router and take care of any changes > (similar to sending a SIGHUP to gated/syslogd/named, etc..) that > were made, would you shift your paradigm from using the routers > nvram as the master and automation to keep the router up-to-date to > using a *nix or other system to generate the configs then feed them > to the router? Believe it or not, this is *exactly* how the things were set up in one of my past lives. Except, of course, HUP's and other niceties. ;) "conf over" was used instead. ;) apb, are you lurking around here? :) If you are - have your say - what are you up to nowdays with this scheme of things? SY, -- D.K. _______________________________________________ cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/ |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Multi-VRF BGP: Does it support unique BGP AS number per VRF?: 00116, William Chu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: VPN using dynamic peer address: 00116, Lim Fung |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 12.3T - a niiiiice feature :)i: 00116, Gert Doering |
| Next by Thread: | RE: 12.3T - a niiiiice feature :): 00116, Kevin Kincaid |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |